Closed
Bug 477930
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 1 month ago
New TUnit test_rdf\unit\test_rdfredirect.js leaks 2,972 bytes
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: RDF, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: sgautherie, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: memory-leak)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
4.16 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090117 Minefield/3.2a1pre] (home, optim default) (W2Ksp4) (http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/184eadf4e185 + bug 446300 patch) Test not there yet: landed on Jan 29 08:49:07 2009 -0800. http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/01c42e286b4c Could someone add "Blocks: 414540" ? Thanks. [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090210 Minefield/3.2a1pre] (home, optim default) (W2Ksp4) (http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/561dc7d5c746) Leak.
Flags: blocking1.9.2?
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #361682 -
Attachment description: test_bookmarks_html.js.log → test_bookmarks_html.js.log [Wrong attachment]
Attachment #361682 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Benjamin, Neil, Boris?
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
No idea. This looks like all RDF-land, all the time. Don't we have existing bugs on RDF not doing cycle-collection and being leaky? Does the strong ref the XMLRDF data source hold to the RDF service matter?
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Bug 372713 and bug 383939 were about cycle collection of rdf data sources, both resolved FIXED.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0) > Could someone add "Blocks: 414540" ? Thanks. Done :-)
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090312 Minefield/3.2a1pre] (home, optim default) (W2Ksp4) (http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/2752d979b84f) [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090312 SeaMonkey/2.0b1pre] (experimental/_m-c_, home, optim default) (W2Ksp4) (http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6f6d47027297 +http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/be064d80219d) Confirming with SM.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
Confirmed by { http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Thunderbird/1238183877.1238186339.30647.gz&fulltext=1 Linux comm-central check on 2009/03/27 12:57:57 }
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
Confirmed by { http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Thunderbird3.0/1238257155.1238260151.7894.gz&fulltext=1 MacOSX 10.4 comm-1.9.1 check on 2009/03/28 09:19:15 }
Flags: wanted1.9.1?
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Flags: wanted1.9.1? → wanted1.9.1.x?
Updated•15 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.9.2? → blocking1.9.2-
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Flags: wanted1.9.2?
Updated•15 years ago
|
status1.9.1:
--- → ?
Flags: wanted1.9.1.x?
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
I can't reproduce this leak on Windows 7 with the following command: make -C rdf/tests/ xpcshell-tests I just fixed a similar leak in another xpcshell test so I know I have leak tracking on.
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
status1.9.1:
? → ---
Flags: wanted1.9.2?
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•