489285 - WinFileAttributes tests - TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | Test Win Attribs: GetFileAttributesWin attributed did not match. (2)

Status: NEW

(Core :: XPCOM, defect)

Description

[Robert Strong (they/them - no direct email)]

WINNT 5.2 mozilla-central unit test on 2009/04/20 19:16:26

http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox/1240280186.1240290367.24720.gz&fulltext=1

Running WinFileAttributes tests...
Is XP or greater, running tests...
<a name='err0'></a><a href='#err1'>NEXT ERROR</a> <font color='000080'>TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | Test Win Attribs: GetFileAttributesWin attributed did not match. (2)
</font>Finished running WinFileAttributes tests.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/e/builds/moz2_slave/mozilla-central-win32-unittest/build/objdir/xpcom/tests/windows'
<a name='err1'></a><a href='#err2'>NEXT ERROR</a> <font color='000080'>make[3]: *** [check] Error 1
</font><font color='000080'>make[2]: *** [check] Error 2

Jim, could this somehow have been caused by bug 403014?

Comment 1

[Robert Strong (they/them - no direct email)]

Might have been caused by bug 487721

Comment 2

[Robert Strong (they/them - no direct email)]

I missed the first occurrence

WINNT 5.2 mozilla-central unit test on 2009/04/20 18:55:20
http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox/1240278920.1240286377.19075.gz&fulltext=1

http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=a6b1b49f7d7e&tochange=36f215de9433

Comment 3

[Jim Mathies [:jimm]]

working on a fix, should land here in a bit.

Comment 4

[Jim Mathies [:jimm]]

Why would this block Bug 487721 -  deliver NSS 3.12.4 RC0 to mozilla-central?

Comment 5

[Robert Strong (they/them - no direct email)]

The pushlog in comment #2 which is from the first failure of this test placed blame on Bug 487721. I had the wrong range when I reported this bug and thought it might be due to your changes. I've removed the dependency at the same time as this comment.

Comment 6

[Jim Mathies [:jimm]]

Alright, I disabled this temporarily. The test succeeds locally on Vista just fine and the bit operations on the flags look right. I'll have to do some testing on xp to figure out what's wrong on tinderbox.

Comment 7

[Benjamin Smedberg]

This is likely due to the tinderboxes using FAT32 instead of NTFS, which is why we have the downloads-inherit-securityACL test disabled as well.

Comment 8

[Masatoshi Kimura [:emk]]

Yeah, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NOT_CONTENT_INDEXED is not supported on FAT32 volume.