Closed
Bug 489422
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Ability to resolve DNS names through different SOCKS servers
Categories
(Core :: Networking, defect)
Core
Networking
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: ericjung, Unassigned)
Details
network.proxy.socks_remote_dns allows for the ability toresolve DNS names through a SOCKS server.
Rather than always resolving through the SOCKS server, please consider adding
an interface, similar to nsIProtocolProxyFilter, that would enable extensions
and other clients to dynamically determine whether to resolve a given domain
through a proxy or not, and through which proxy.
The interface's signature could be, for example:
nsIProxyInfo applyFilter(in nsIURI aURI, in nsIProxyInfo aProxy)
with a corresponding interface for registering/unregistering filters (like
nsIProtocolProxyService.registerFilter() and
nsIProtocolProxyService.unregisterFilter()).
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
This is already handled by nsIProtocolProxyFilter.applyFilter. Just conditionally return a nsIProxyInfo instance with the 4th argument true/false.
Closing as RESOLVED - WONTFIX.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•