Closed
Bug 49030
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
extra ">" added to unclosed tags.
Categories
(Core :: DOM: HTML Parser, defect, P3)
Core
DOM: HTML Parser
Tracking
()
Future
People
(Reporter: jens-uwe, Assigned: harishd)
Details
(Keywords: testcase)
Attachments
(1 file)
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20000814
BuildID: 2000081420
the web page looks like garbage
it seems the width of some frames is too small.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.go to www.handyshop.de and wait a moment.
2.look at the screen
3.
Actual Results: looks strange
Expected Results: should look good
the html code of the page seems to be messy
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Just CC'ing myself cos I want to see comments on the frameset html ;) Frankly
I'm astounded that NS4.7 renders it as well as it does. It must be making some
pretty lucky guesses.
Updated•24 years ago
|
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
the page has three things that look like this:
<FRAME src="blue_01.htm"
<FRAMESET cols="*,100,*" rows="*" frameborder="no" border="0"
framespacing="0" scrolling="no">
closing the FRAMEs and removing the FRAMESETs makes both browsers display it
like ie 5 (looks nice), and just closing the FRAMEs makes both browsers display
it like moz (looks ugly). i don't know which behavior is more correct for the
original page.
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: PC → All
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
confirming and sending to parser.
moz 2000081908 on win98 makes the donuts bold and italic in the above testcase,
whereas ie 5.5 and netscape 4.75 just make them bold.
when i view-source in moz, i see a > where there isn't one. should this be a
separate bug?
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Layout → Parser
Ever confirmed: true
Summary: incorrect width of frames → unclosed (unfinished?) tags handled in a strange way
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
sounds like a parser bug/content sink bug - reassigning
Assignee: rods → harishd
This is total wackyness in the document. I think this bug is a "nice to fix"
but not a "must fix". Marking it FUTURE.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
Yes, it's wacky, but I think it's important that at least the view-source part
of this bug be fixed. Clearing "future" milestone.
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
Nope, not a high priority at this stage of the project. We have more important
things to fix. Sorry. Have to mark this bug FUTURE.
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
seems to work fine with the build 20001022 for Linux.
Can someone mark this as FIXED?
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
http://www.handyshop.de/ has fixed the problem, but Mozilla still screws up
when viewing and view-sourcing the testcase.
By the way, should the view-source thing be a separate bug?
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
the view source bug here is also bug 70918. If that is dupped against this,
please change the summary of this to reflect the fact that it is a view source bug.
Comment 14•23 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 57724 ***
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
Reopening 57724 dependencies for independent resolution.
Comment 16•23 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 70918 ***
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago → 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Summary: unclosed (unfinished?) tags handled in a strange way → extra ">" added to unclosed tags.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•