Closed Bug 492080 Opened 16 years ago Closed 16 years ago

[FIX]Need more-correct marking of floats with dirty bits on interrupt

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

x86
macOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: bzbarsky, Assigned: bzbarsky)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

The interruptible reflow patch that landed had a small chunk to add dirty bits to floats on interrupt, but now that I look at it again it'll screw up other out-of-flows. I'm not sure it ever gotr reviewed either; I might have added it as part of the "address review comments" step. Patch coming up to make it better.
Attached patch Like soSplinter Review
Attachment #376445 - Flags: superreview?
Attachment #376445 - Flags: review?
Attachment #376445 - Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #376445 - Flags: superreview?
Attachment #376445 - Flags: review?(dbaron)
Attachment #376445 - Flags: review?
Comment on attachment 376445 [details] [diff] [review] Like so I guess this is more correct because (1) other out-of-flows aren't reflowed during line reflow so shouldn't be marked dirty here (or something like that??) and (2) some placeholders aren't children of the line, but deeper descendants? anyway, r+sr=dbaron
Attachment #376445 - Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #376445 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #376445 - Flags: review?(dbaron)
Attachment #376445 - Flags: review+
Yes on both counts. (1) is especially important, because we'd be scattering dirty bits around without necessarily having all ancestors of the out of flow in question have said dirty bits, which can cause reflows to be silently swallowed. I'll admit that I hadn't even though of (2)... Good catch on it.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite?
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: