Some 'B' coverage tests fail in the interpreter on x64-linux

VERIFIED FIXED

Status

Tamarin
Virtual Machine
VERIFIED FIXED
9 years ago
8 years ago

People

(Reporter: Lars T Hansen, Assigned: Steven Johnson)

Tracking

Details

Attachments

(1 obsolete attachment)

(Reporter)

Description

9 years ago
FAILURES:
  abcasm/coverage/B.abc : not uint FAILED! expected: 2147483647, actual: 2147483647
  abcasm/coverage/B.abc : int or uint FAILED! expected: -1, actual: 4294967295
  abcasm/coverage/B.abc : int xor uint FAILED! expected: -1052689, actual: 4293914607

Presumably related to bug #465754.
(Reporter)

Comment 1

9 years ago
BTW, the curious first failure is probably due to the same value having two different representations (which is part of the underlying bug here).
(Reporter)

Comment 2

9 years ago
Created attachment 378656 [details] [diff] [review]
Plausible patch to expect these to fail on 64-bit systems

Feel free to push following approval if you want to quiet down the buildbot.
Attachment #378656 - Flags: review?(brbaker)
(Reporter)

Comment 3

9 years ago
Comment on attachment 378656 [details] [diff] [review]
Plausible patch to expect these to fail on 64-bit systems

redux changeset 1914:bef539a2544a
Attachment #378656 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #378656 - Flags: review?(brbaker)
(Assignee)

Comment 4

9 years ago
fixed in changeset:   2006:d5654b2ac8b2
Assignee: nobody → stejohns
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED

Comment 5

8 years ago
tests are passing on all 64bit systems in buildbot
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.