Closed Bug 495226 Opened 16 years ago Closed 16 years ago

Update OpenSearch notification on the search engine button on Windows

Categories

(Firefox :: Theme, defect)

x86
Windows Vista
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: faaborg, Assigned: ehsan.akhgari)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [icon-shiretoko][icon-complete])

Attachments

(3 files, 3 obsolete files)

Now that we have refreshed secondary glyphs for Windows, I think we should consider using the glowing hit state of /source/toolkit/themes/winstripe/global/arrow/arrow-down.png /source/toolkit/themes/winstripe/global/arrow/arrow-down-aero.png (added in bug 495218) as a notification of OpenSearch instead of the current blue glow. This is primarily an aesthetic change as opposed to an interactive change. In this state the hit state would be the same as the normal state.
Whiteboard: [icon-shiretoko][icon-complete]
beltzner should ui-r since I proposed the change
Attached image Mockup
Assignee: nobody → ehsan.akhgari
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Depends on: 495218
Attached patch Patch (v1) (obsolete) — Splinter Review
I'll attach screenshots for beltzner's ui-r in a moment...
Attachment #380146 - Flags: review?(dao)
Attached image Screenshot (1:1) (obsolete) —
Order of images from top to bottom: 1. Current normal drop-down arrow. 2. Patched normal drop-down arrow. 3. Current OpenSearch notification. 4. Patches OpenSearch notification.
Attachment #380147 - Flags: ui-review?(beltzner)
Attached image Screenshot (100:1) (obsolete) —
The same as attachment 380147 [details], scaled at 100x for better viewing of the details.
Attachment #380148 - Attachment description: Screenshot (1:100) → Screenshot (100:1)
Depends on: 495606
No longer depends on: 495218
Depends on: 495218
Ehsan, could you prepare a patch and before/after screenshots for ui-review on top of the patch in bug 495606? We shouldn't change the search dropdown without the location dropdown, so that's a hard dependency.
No longer depends on: 495218
Attachment #380146 - Flags: review?(dao)
Attachment #380146 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #380147 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #380148 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #381012 - Flags: review?(dao)
Attachment #380147 - Flags: ui-review?(beltzner)
Attached image Before/After screenshot
The "before" screenshots are in fact with bug 495606 applied.
Attachment #381013 - Flags: ui-review?(beltzner)
Attachment #381012 - Flags: review?(dao) → review+
Comment on attachment 381012 [details] [diff] [review] Patch based on bug 495606 >-.searchbar-engine-button[open="true"] > .searchbar-dropmarker-image { >+.searchbar-engine-button[addengines="true"] > .searchbar-dropmarker-image { > -moz-image-region: rect(0, 26px, 11px, 13px); > } I think it would make sense to still use the glowing arrow for the hit state, for consistency with the location dropdown and the all tabs button: >.searchbar-engine-button[addengines="true"] > .searchbar-dropmarker-image, >.searchbar-engine-button[open="true"] > .searchbar-dropmarker-image { > -moz-image-region: rect(0, 26px, 11px, 13px); >} fine by me either way.
(In reply to comment #9) > I think it would make sense to still use the glowing arrow for the hit state, > for consistency with the location dropdown and the all tabs button: Beltzner: please let us know which version you prefer.
Attachment #381012 - Flags: approval1.9.1?
Follow up bug for a similar change on OS X: bug 495745
Comment on attachment 381012 [details] [diff] [review] Patch based on bug 495606 For the same reasons as mentioned in bug 495606 comment 8, not gonna take this on branch at this time.
Attachment #381012 - Flags: approval1.9.0.12-
Attachment #381013 - Flags: ui-review?(beltzner) → ui-review+
Attachment #381012 - Flags: approval1.9.1?
Attachment #381012 - Flags: approval1.9.1-
Attachment #381012 - Flags: approval1.9.0.12-
Comment on attachment 381012 [details] [diff] [review] Patch based on bug 495606 Given bug 482229, no point in taking it on trunk if it won't make 3.5.
Attachment #381012 - Flags: review+
(In reply to comment #13) > (From update of attachment 381012 [details] [diff] [review]) > Given bug 482229, no point in taking it on trunk if it won't make 3.5. So, can I mark this as WONTFIX?
yep
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Depends on: 482229
No longer depends on: 482229
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: