Closed
Bug 495226
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Update OpenSearch notification on the search engine button on Windows
Categories
(Firefox :: Theme, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: faaborg, Assigned: ehsan.akhgari)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [icon-shiretoko][icon-complete])
Attachments
(3 files, 3 obsolete files)
14.11 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
4.04 KB,
patch
|
beltzner
:
approval1.9.1-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
22.42 KB,
image/png
|
beltzner
:
ui-review+
|
Details |
Now that we have refreshed secondary glyphs for Windows, I think we should consider using the glowing hit state of
/source/toolkit/themes/winstripe/global/arrow/arrow-down.png
/source/toolkit/themes/winstripe/global/arrow/arrow-down-aero.png
(added in bug 495218)
as a notification of OpenSearch instead of the current blue glow. This is primarily an aesthetic change as opposed to an interactive change. In this state the hit state would be the same as the normal state.
Reporter | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [icon-shiretoko][icon-complete]
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
beltzner should ui-r since I proposed the change
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
I'll attach screenshots for beltzner's ui-r in a moment...
Attachment #380146 -
Flags: review?(dao)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
Order of images from top to bottom:
1. Current normal drop-down arrow.
2. Patched normal drop-down arrow.
3. Current OpenSearch notification.
4. Patches OpenSearch notification.
Attachment #380147 -
Flags: ui-review?(beltzner)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
The same as attachment 380147 [details], scaled at 100x for better viewing of the details.
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #380148 -
Attachment description: Screenshot (1:100) → Screenshot (100:1)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
Ehsan, could you prepare a patch and before/after screenshots for ui-review on top of the patch in bug 495606? We shouldn't change the search dropdown without the location dropdown, so that's a hard dependency.
No longer depends on: 495218
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #380146 -
Flags: review?(dao)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #380146 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #380147 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #380148 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #381012 -
Flags: review?(dao)
Attachment #380147 -
Flags: ui-review?(beltzner)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
The "before" screenshots are in fact with bug 495606 applied.
Attachment #381013 -
Flags: ui-review?(beltzner)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #381012 -
Flags: review?(dao) → review+
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 381012 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch based on bug 495606
>-.searchbar-engine-button[open="true"] > .searchbar-dropmarker-image {
>+.searchbar-engine-button[addengines="true"] > .searchbar-dropmarker-image {
> -moz-image-region: rect(0, 26px, 11px, 13px);
> }
I think it would make sense to still use the glowing arrow for the hit state, for consistency with the location dropdown and the all tabs button:
>.searchbar-engine-button[addengines="true"] > .searchbar-dropmarker-image,
>.searchbar-engine-button[open="true"] > .searchbar-dropmarker-image {
> -moz-image-region: rect(0, 26px, 11px, 13px);
>}
fine by me either way.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9)
> I think it would make sense to still use the glowing arrow for the hit state,
> for consistency with the location dropdown and the all tabs button:
Beltzner: please let us know which version you prefer.
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #381012 -
Flags: approval1.9.1?
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Follow up bug for a similar change on OS X: bug 495745
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 381012 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch based on bug 495606
For the same reasons as mentioned in bug 495606 comment 8, not gonna take this on branch at this time.
Attachment #381012 -
Flags: approval1.9.0.12-
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #381013 -
Flags: ui-review?(beltzner) → ui-review+
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #381012 -
Flags: approval1.9.1?
Attachment #381012 -
Flags: approval1.9.1-
Attachment #381012 -
Flags: approval1.9.0.12-
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 381012 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch based on bug 495606
Given bug 482229, no point in taking it on trunk if it won't make 3.5.
Attachment #381012 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #13)
> (From update of attachment 381012 [details] [diff] [review])
> Given bug 482229, no point in taking it on trunk if it won't make 3.5.
So, can I mark this as WONTFIX?
Comment 15•16 years ago
|
||
yep
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•