Open
Bug 496670
Opened 15 years ago
Updated 14 years ago
Bugzilla needs better patch review process with annotations and versioned patches
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Attachments & Requests, enhancement)
Tracking
()
REOPENED
People
(Reporter: ddkilzer, Unassigned)
Details
* SUMMARY
It would be nice if Bugzilla had an integrated, enhanced review process that allowed patches to be annotated and "versioned", similar to tools like Reitveld <http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/> or Review Board <http://www.review-board.org/>.
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Looks like a dupe of bug 291328 to me. I'm not sure I want "duplicated" code to do something which can already be done by a 3rd party tool.
Severity: normal → enhancement
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Looks like a dupe of bug 291328 to me.
It's certainly related, but I wouldn't consider it a dupe. This is more about making the patch review process support more features, specifically:
- Annotating patches (adding comments about certain parts of a patch that are displayed on demand) instead of the more simple "Edit as comment" button, which makes large patches difficult to review since so much editing is involved.
- Versioning the same patch so that instead of having N obsolete patches with 1 reviewed patch, Bugzilla would present a single patch attachment with multiple versions of it available, and be able to show differences between the patches themselves ("diff" the patches, if you will).
There may be other features, but those were the main two. (I probably should have split this into two bugs, huh?)
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> - Versioning the same patch so that instead of having N obsolete patches with 1
> reviewed patch, Bugzilla would present a single patch attachment with multiple
> versions of it available, and be able to show differences between the patches
> themselves ("diff" the patches, if you will).
There is the interdiff feature which does that, already. I don't think we need any improvement in this area.
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Is this obsoleted by Splinter?
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Yes this is mostly a duplicate of the Splinter effort. There are a couple of features mentioned in comment 0 and comment 2 that are not yet in Splinter that we would still need to implement. Primarily versioning of patches. Interdiff does do this to some extent but they are separate tools as far as Bugzilla is concerned. There could be some work to integrate the two in the future.
You can do annotations with the current version of Splinter. We should close this bug and open up separate very specific bug reports against the Splinter component that addresses each of the requested features.
dkl
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
bmo is not Bugzilla, and vanilla Bugzilla has no such feature yet. Reopening!
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6)
> bmo is not Bugzilla, and vanilla Bugzilla has no such feature yet. Reopening!
Apologize that I misread the product and closed this. I just saw the mention of Splinter and made the wrong assumption.
dkl
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•