Closed
Bug 511900
(rudehypocrite2)
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
web site styling should be prime example of best practices
Categories
(www.mozilla.org :: General, defect)
www.mozilla.org
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: mrmazda, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
This is an offshoot of bug 225639.
The about-to-be-released redesign is still setting some font sizes in px, and setting contrast to values marginally above WCAG on the very same undersized text. This is rude, unnecessary, and a major reason why browsers need to provide their users such defensive measures as minimum font size and zoom, and outsiders provide bookmarklets such as on http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=23476&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a.
To summarize, most web site text should be clearly legible. Reduced contrast and reduced size both contribute to reduced legibility. A reduction of either necessitates an increase in the other to compensate. Both the current site styles and the beta site styles generally reduce both. To put it politely, this is unfriendly, and unwelcome by users.
All the latest browser versions in common use have very good CSS support, which includes the ability to incorporate a large measure of resolution independence by sizing primarily in ems. Resolution independent designs allow users to enjoy a page without resorting to defensive measures; to use them comfortably just as they find them. Unfortunately this is not very common. Mozilla should lead the way to reverse this unpleasant condition, to boldly show others that it can be done, and how.
These articles are just a few that explain font sizing and other legibility issues:
http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/font-size
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/designmistakes.html
http://tobyinkster.co.uk/article/web-fonts/
http://www.lighthouse.org/accessibility/top-10/
http://www.lighthouse.org/accessibility/legible/
http://www.dev-archive.net/articles/font-analogy.html
http://fm.no-ip.com/auth/accessibility.html
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
I certainly agree that www.mozilla.org should be a example of best practices and can lead in establishing new ways to handle things as web standards evolve. With that having been said, I don't think we should block the relaunch on this issue and we can address this after the redesign goes live.
I suggest getting Happy Cog (the designers who worked on this project) involved to discuss why they made the decisions they did -- they are focused on web standards best practices as well and probably have some worthwhile things to add to this discussion. We can then discuss the decision making behind these choices and discuss our available options and decide if we need to make changes and what changes to make.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
This is what it looks like to a high DPI visitor not using minimum font size or zoom. Note the comment near the bottom describing limitations of viewing it.
If it was up to me I would block launch until fonts conform to best practices.
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the screenshot -- there is certainly an issue here to look into, but we're not going to block things on this.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
Here the "readable" bookmarklet from the first link in comment 0 is also applied. .moral-wrap/.agree is obliterating the upper right of #content even though the page has voluminous whitespace. The obliteration is similar, and worse, on /en-US/firefox/personal.html, where many links in the columns below the fold overlap each other, even though there is more than ample surrounding blank space.
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
Note that the screenshot in comment #4 is from www.mozilla.com which is separate from www.mozilla.org. If this is a general concern for all mozilla sites then maybe this is a governance bug?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
The URL for the screenshot in comment 4 was reached by clicking the most prominent Firefox link on the homepage. For styling purposes, as long as that kind of "offsite" behavior is common on mozilla.org pages, mozilla.com and mozilla.org should be treated as one entity.
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Closing old Mozilla.org website bugs due to them not being relevant to the new Python-based Bedrock system. Re-open if this is a critical bug and should be resolved on the new system too.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
Fonts remain sized in px, so the root problem remains the same.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WONTFIX → ---
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
We are changing fonts across Mozilla.org in the near future.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago → 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Here, at a display density nominally higher than "normal", P text is 14px, less than half the physical size of the user's 12pt optimal. Caption text is 12px, barely half the user's physical size 10pt UI text. And, both are gray, further reducing legibility.
URI of screenshot: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/mission/ (Current mozilla.org home is virtually void of text.)
Page's headline:
"Our mission is to promote openness, innovation & opportunity on the Web."
From "How to Meet WCAG 2.0" <http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/> section Advisory Techniques for 1.4.4: "Avoiding scaling font sizes smaller than the user-agent default...The author won't actually know the font size, but should avoid percentage scaling that results in less than 100%."
5+ years later, www.mozilla.org s still styled for pleasing stylists instead of users, for scanning instead of reading, for emulating the majority of the web, instead of for demonstrating how users should be treated, in significant part, by following WCAG guidelines.
WONTFIX to this now, without first "changing fonts across Mozilla.org", amounts to a statement of official policy that web site styling should be *not* prime example of best practices, being inconsistent with whatever official policies and/or goals really are.
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mike Alexis [:malexis] from comment #9)
> We are changing fonts across Mozilla.org in the near future.
Then why not leave this bug as OPENED and then resolve it as RESOLVED when changes applied honor the expected results?
Today, font-size of unstyled body text in many www.mozilla.org webpages are set with px unit (14px and even 12px) and not with relative unit (like % or em). Today, color of unstyled body text in many www.mozilla.org webpages use #333 which reduces color contrast.
"
web site text should be clearly legible. Reduced contrast and reduced size both contribute to reduced legibility.
"
Gérard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•