512835 - 8 failures within layout/generic/test_backspace_delete.xul

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 474068

(Core :: DOM: Editor, defect)

Description

[Zack Weinberg (:zwol)]

Attachment: screen shot of failure list

I have never been able to persuade test_backspace_delete.xul to pass 100%.  I always get 8 failures.  I'm attaching a screen shot of the failure list, because it is not letting me copy and paste the text.

Comment 1

[Joel Maher ( :jmaher ) (UTC -8)]

I ran into this while testing a patch on my local linux box.  Same exact failures:

18 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/layout/generic/test/test_backspace_delete.xul | Right movement broken in "**HA!H5HI-", offset 5 - got 7, expected 5
20 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/layout/generic/test/test_backspace_delete.xul | Delete broken in "**HA!HI-", offset 5 - got 7, expected 5
21 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/layout/generic/test/test_backspace_delete.xul | Delete broken in "**HA!HI-", offset 5 - got "**HA!HI-", expected "**HA5HI-"
23 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/layout/generic/test/test_backspace_delete.xul | Right movement broken in "**HA!HI-", offset 8 - got 9, expected 8
25 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/layout/generic/test/test_backspace_delete.xul | Delete broken in "**HA!HI", offset 8 - got 9, expected 8
26 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/layout/generic/test/test_backspace_delete.xul | Delete broken in "**HA!HI", offset 8 - got "**HA!HI", expected "**HA5H-"
28 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/layout/generic/test/test_backspace_delete.xul | Right movement broken in "**HA!HI", offset 9 - got 10, expected 9
29 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/layout/generic/test/test_backspace_delete.xul | [SimpleTest/SimpleTest.js, window.onerror] An error occurred - uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsIController.doCommand]"  nsresult: "0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE)"  location: "JS frame :: http://mochitest.org:8888/tests/layout/generic/test/test_backspace_delete.xul :: doCommand :: line 56"  data: no] at :0

Comment 2

[Jesse Ruderman]

Dup of bug 474068?