Closed
Bug 513348
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
JSVAL_INT overflow in regexp matching on 64-bit systems
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
status1.9.2 | --- | beta1-fixed |
People
(Reporter: luke, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: fixed-in-tracemonkey)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
827 bytes,
patch
|
brendan
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
While jsval is 64 bits on 64-bit systems, JSVAL_INTs are still 31-bit integers.
Since, on 64-bit systems, Strings can be > 32 bits, assignment of match indices to jsvals can overflow. Two instances I've found are in str_search and js_ExecuteRegExp in jsregexp.cpp, but I suspect there are others.
This is a problem for the x64 JIT too because we want indexes to be 32-bit integers. As a compromise to solve this and that situation, this patch limits string lengths to 30 bits, since an unsigned 30-bit integer can still fit in a 31-bit jsval.
I would have liked to make this based on JSVAL_INT_BITS but I couldn't use that from jsstr.h so I made a static assert instead.
Attachment #398062 -
Flags: review?(brendan)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
I just talked to David about this, and there is an argument for changing the type returned by JSString::length() (and taken by getCharsAndLength) to reflect the fact that the length can necessarily fit in a JSVAL_INT. Perhaps jsuint? This would probably require a rather large patch, so maybe something to do later.
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 398062 [details] [diff] [review]
proposed patch
>+JS_STATIC_ASSERT(size_t(JSString::MAX_LENGTH) <= UINT_MAX &&
>+ INT_FITS_IN_JSVAL(JSString::MAX_LENGTH));
Two separate static assertions in a row beats one using && so you can tell what botched.
I don't see the connection with UINT_MAX, which depends on the target C++ type model. Are we using unsigned/uintN/uint anywhere relevant? If you mean jsuint, then
$ grep jsuint *.h | grep typedef
jspubtd.h:typedef uint32 jsuint;
suggests using JSUINT_MAX and defining that appropriately in jspubtd.h. ILP64 targets will have an overlarge UINT_MAX but jsuint will still be uint32.
r=me once I understand the <limits.h>/UINT_MAX dependency.
/be
Removed limits.h dependency. Also lowered bits to 29 from 30, so waiting for OOM in some tests doesn't take forever and slow your system to a crawl.
Alternately I could raise it back up to 30, and shortcut in ConcatStrings etc that the resulting string will fit in a JSString.
Attachment #398062 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #401066 -
Flags: review?(brendan)
Attachment #398062 -
Flags: review?(brendan)
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 401066 [details] [diff] [review]
v2
>+#if JS_BITS_PER_WORD > 32
>+ LENGTH_BITS = 29,
>+#else
> LENGTH_BITS = JS_BITS_PER_WORD - 4,
>+#endif
In the interest of inter-operation, why not use 28 for both 32- and 64-bit targets?
r=me with that.
/be
Attachment #401066 -
Flags: review?(brendan) → review+
pushed with change from comment #5
http://hg.mozilla.org/tracemonkey/rev/126a52305332
Whiteboard: fixed-in-tracemonkey
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Might be better to avoid the ifdef and always use 28, elsewhere static-asserting that JS_BITS_PER_WORD - 28 >= 4 (the number of bits reserved for flags). But the static assert should live near the reserved flags' definitions, hrm. Maybe this is the way to go.
/be
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7)
> Maybe this is the way to go.
In case this was confusing, I mean let's go with what landed ;-).
/be
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
status1.9.2:
--- → beta1-fixed
Flags: wanted1.9.2+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•