Closed Bug 516465 Opened 16 years ago Closed 16 years ago

Adaptive results aren't filtered

Categories

(Toolkit :: Places, defect, P2)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla1.9.3a1
Tracking Status
status1.9.2 --- beta1-fixed

People

(Reporter: Mardak, Assigned: sdwilsh)

References

Details

(Keywords: privacy, regression)

Attachments

(1 file, 2 obsolete files)

The adaptive query needs to use AUTOCOMPLETE_MATCH where before we post-processed results and the function handled adaptive results the same way as regular searches.
this could be blocking, i mean, it's a privacy concern. what do you think?
Keywords: privacy
Keywords: regression
Yeah, if a user switches to just History, some adaptive bookmarks could be shown.
Flags: blocking1.9.2?
assigning to sdwilsh for now, since it's an async location bar regression.
Assignee: nobody → sdwilsh
Flags: blocking1.9.2? → blocking1.9.2+
Priority: -- → P2
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Whiteboard: [needs patch]
We'd need to re-run the adaptive query with the less restrictive match behavior when we have the behavior MATCH_BOUNDARY_ANYWHERE, right?
I suppose that's undefined and could go either way. But if it's re-running queries, it's going through the whole history anyway. Might be strange to have adaptive boundary, history boundary, adaptive anywhere, history anywhere results.. Well, the user doesn't really know what type of result it is anyway.
(In reply to comment #2) > Yeah, if a user switches to just History, some adaptive bookmarks could be > shown. What we really want to check is that we don't show the star, right?
Attached patch v1.0 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #402452 - Flags: review?(dietrich)
Flags: in-testsuite?
Flags: in-litmus-
Whiteboard: [needs patch] → [needs review dietrich]
Attached patch v1.0 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Now with more cowbell^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcontext
Attachment #402452 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #403327 - Flags: review?(dietrich)
Attachment #402452 - Flags: review?(dietrich)
Comment on attachment 403327 [details] [diff] [review] v1.0 looks ok, r=me > /** > * Test adapative autocomplete > */ > function run_test() { > do_test_pending(); > (tests.shift())(); can you fix that while you're in that file?
Attachment #403327 - Flags: review?(dietrich) → review+
(In reply to comment #9) > can you fix that while you're in that file? Don't really know what you are asking for here. Elaborate?
Whiteboard: [needs review dietrich] → [can land]
(In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > can you fix that while you're in that file? > Don't really know what you are asking for here. Elaborate? in the comment: "adapative"
Attached patch v1.1Splinter Review
per review comments.
Attachment #403327 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite? → in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [can land]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.3a1
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: