Check .mv entry in Public Suffix List

RESOLVED FIXED

Status

()

RESOLVED FIXED
9 years ago
9 years ago

People

(Reporter: gerv, Assigned: gerv)

Tracking

({fixed1.9.0.18})

Trunk
fixed1.9.0.18
Points:
---

Firefox Tracking Flags

(status1.9.2 final-fixed, status1.9.1 .8-fixed)

Details

Attachments

(1 attachment)

I received the following email:

Hi *,

the current version of http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/netwerk/dns/src/effective_tld_names.dat?raw=1 contains:

// mv : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.mv
*.mv

Google was able to register google.mv so I'm not sure if *.mv is still appropriate.


Gerv
The registrar's website (they are also the telco and ISP for the Maldives) is profoundly uninformative on the subject of registrations. 

Let's switch to "mv", and then the list of subdomains on the wiki page.

Gerv
Created attachment 411963 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1
Assignee: nobody → gerv
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #411963 - Flags: review?(pkasting)

Comment 3

9 years ago
Comment on attachment 411963 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1

I don't see the .mv Wikipedia page as clearly stating that direct second-level registrations are unavailable.  Perhaps we should just omit the comment about that?
Attachment #411963 - Flags: review?(pkasting) → review+
In the info box on the right it says:

"Structure      Used with subdomains .com.mv, .net.mv, .gov.mv & such"

But I can leave it out if you like.

Gerv

Comment 5

9 years ago
Ah, I didn't notice that.  I've just edited the wiki page to reflect reality.  Hopefully now the comment is unnecessary :)
Comment on attachment 411963 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1

Requesting 1.9.2 approval. Part of general public suffix list maintenance. (After this, I'd expect to get approval for 1.9.1 and 1.9.0 also.)

Gerv
Attachment #411963 - Flags: approval1.9.2?
Attachment #411963 - Flags: approval1.9.2? → approval1.9.2+
Attachment #411963 - Flags: approval1.9.1.7?
Attachment #411963 - Flags: approval1.9.0.17?
status1.9.2: --- → beta5-fixed
Shouldn't this have landed on trunk first?
status1.9.2: beta5-fixed → final-fixed
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment on attachment 411963 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1

Approved for 1.9.1.7 and 1.9.0.17, a=dveditz for release-drivers
Attachment #411963 - Flags: approval1.9.1.7?
Attachment #411963 - Flags: approval1.9.1.7+
Attachment #411963 - Flags: approval1.9.0.17?
Attachment #411963 - Flags: approval1.9.0.17+
Fixed on 1.9.1 branch:
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.1/rev/10d75e0578a6

and 1.9.0 branch:
Checking in netwerk/dns/src/effective_tld_names.dat;
/cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/dns/src/effective_tld_names.dat,v  <--  effective_tld_names.dat
new revision: 1.14; previous revision: 1.13
done

Gerv
status1.9.1: --- → .8-fixed
Keywords: fixed1.9.0.18
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.