I received the following email: Hi *, the current version of http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/netwerk/dns/src/effective_tld_names.dat?raw=1 contains: // mv : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.mv *.mv Google was able to register google.mv so I'm not sure if *.mv is still appropriate. Gerv
The registrar's website (they are also the telco and ISP for the Maldives) is profoundly uninformative on the subject of registrations. Let's switch to "mv", and then the list of subdomains on the wiki page. Gerv
Created attachment 411963 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v.1
Comment on attachment 411963 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v.1 I don't see the .mv Wikipedia page as clearly stating that direct second-level registrations are unavailable. Perhaps we should just omit the comment about that?
In the info box on the right it says: "Structure Used with subdomains .com.mv, .net.mv, .gov.mv & such" But I can leave it out if you like. Gerv
Ah, I didn't notice that. I've just edited the wiki page to reflect reality. Hopefully now the comment is unnecessary :)
Comment on attachment 411963 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v.1 Requesting 1.9.2 approval. Part of general public suffix list maintenance. (After this, I'd expect to get approval for 1.9.1 and 1.9.0 also.) Gerv
Shouldn't this have landed on trunk first?
Comment on attachment 411963 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v.1 Approved for 22.214.171.124 and 126.96.36.199, a=dveditz for release-drivers
Fixed on 1.9.1 branch: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.1/rev/10d75e0578a6 and 1.9.0 branch: Checking in netwerk/dns/src/effective_tld_names.dat; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/dns/src/effective_tld_names.dat,v <-- effective_tld_names.dat new revision: 1.14; previous revision: 1.13 done Gerv