Closed
Bug 530014
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
ARIA single selectable widget should implement nsIAccessibleSelectable
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Core
Disability Access APIs
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: surkov, Assigned: surkov)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: access)
Attachments
(1 file)
19.61 KB,
patch
|
MarcoZ
:
review+
davidb
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
the patch should be part of bug 526703.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
add GetSelectableContainer/GetMultiSelectableContainer, they should helpful for bug 414302. Make GetSelectableContainer to rely on nsIAccessibleSelectable interface.
Assignee: nobody → surkov.alexander
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #413538 -
Flags: review?(marco.zehe)
Attachment #413538 -
Flags: review?(bolterbugz)
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 413538 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
>+already_AddRefed<nsIAccessible>
>+nsAccUtils::GetSelectableContainer(nsIAccessible *aAccessible, PRUint32 aState)
>+{
>+ if (!aAccessible)
>+ return nsnull;
>+
>+ if (!(aState & nsIAccessibleStates::STATE_SELECTABLE))
>+ return nsnull;
>+
>+ nsCOMPtr<nsIAccessibleSelectable> container;
>+ nsCOMPtr<nsIAccessible> parent, accessible(aAccessible);
>+ while (!container) {
Here we expect the container to support nsIAccessibleSelectable. I'm not sure this will help with browser tabs.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> Here we expect the container to support nsIAccessibleSelectable. I'm not sure
> this will help with browser tabs.
Why? nsXULTabsAccessible implements nsIAccessibleSelectable.
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 413538 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
r=me then :)
(I only skimmed the tests. I think I like the directory organization)
>+already_AddRefed<nsIAccessible>
>+nsAccUtils::GetSelectableContainer(nsIAccessible *aAccessible, PRUint32 aState)
>+{
>+ if (!aAccessible)
>+ return nsnull;
>+
>+ if (!(aState & nsIAccessibleStates::STATE_SELECTABLE))
>+ return nsnull;
>+
>+ nsCOMPtr<nsIAccessibleSelectable> container;
Tempting to call this variable 'selectable' but I'm happy either way.
>+++ b/accessible/src/base/nsAccessible.cpp
Attachment #413538 -
Flags: review?(bolterbugz) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> (From update of attachment 413538 [details] [diff] [review])
> r=me then :)
>
> (I only skimmed the tests. I think I like the directory organization)
So am I :) We started to have too many tests to keep them in one directory.
> >+ if (!(aState & nsIAccessibleStates::STATE_SELECTABLE))
> >+ return nsnull;
> >+
> >+ nsCOMPtr<nsIAccessibleSelectable> container;
>
> Tempting to call this variable 'selectable' but I'm happy either way.
I like the "container" name more than 'selectable' because "selectable" keyword is associated with selectable container items. It could be 'selectableContainer' but 'container' is shorter.
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 413538 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
These tests look good. However have you tested if this still works if aria-activedescendant is used to point at one specific of those list items as being focused? In other words, could we enhance test_aria_activedescendant to make sure the nsIAccessibleSelectable is exposed correctly there, too?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6)
> (From update of attachment 413538 [details] [diff] [review])
> These tests look good. However have you tested if this still works if
> aria-activedescendant is used to point at one specific of those list items as
> being focused? In other words, could we enhance test_aria_activedescendant to
> make sure the nsIAccessibleSelectable is exposed correctly there, too?
Please describe how nsIAccessibleSelectable and aria-activedescedant are related. I would bet aria-activedescedant doesn't affect on nsIAccessibleSelectable exposing and it shouldn't depend on nsIAccessibleSelectable at all. What do I miss?
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
Sorry, I was mistaken. aria-activedescendant is only about focusable/focused, not about selection. Sorry for the noise!
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 413538 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
r=me.
Attachment #413538 -
Flags: review?(marco.zehe) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
landed on 1.9.3 - http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8eb40c0a3650
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•