Closed Bug 537151 Opened 16 years ago Closed 16 years ago

get extra transition when modifying style during transitionend event

Categories

(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect, P2)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla1.9.3a1

People

(Reporter: dbaron, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

In bug 521890 comment 13 dolske posted a testcase showing double transitionend events being fired in a testcase reduced from his work on HTML5 videocontrols. The problem seems to be the following (I didn't verify all the details of the following in the debugger, but I think it makes sense based on the ones I did): * at the time we call the transitionend event handler, we've posted a RestyleForAnimation on the element that's transitioning, but we haven't processed it yet * in this testcase (a modified version of dolske's), style is modified during the transitionend event handler * when that happens, we now have both animation and non-animation restyles for the element; we process the non-animation restyles first, and detect that opacity has changed a minute amount, and initiate *another* transition of 'opacity' on the element
Should the firing of the transitionend event just flush out styles?
Maybe, although I want to think about whether there are other problems with the double restyle queue setup.
I think it's actually possible to get into this situation in other ways, especially after bug 528306 lands: all you need is a posted restyle that's pending when the refresh happens. So I think the right solution here is to make the transition manager hold on to completed transitions for one refresh cycle after they complete. This will allow this check: if (oldPT.mEndValue == pt.mEndValue) { // If we got a style change that changed the value to the endpoint // of the currently running transition, we don't want to interrupt // its timing function. // WalkTransitionRule already called RestyleForAnimation. return; } in nsTransitionManager::ConsiderStartingTransition to prevent a new transition from starting in these cases.
Er, I forgot the verb in that sentence. Should have said "seems to fix this bug".
Attached patch patchSplinter Review
I added a test. Regarding the relationship to the other patch in the previous comment: to swap the order of the patches, I'd just take the introduction of the oldPT variable (and removal of endVal) in that patch and put it in this one.
Attachment #420650 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #420650 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review+
Comment on attachment 420650 [details] [diff] [review] patch r=bzbarsky
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Priority: -- → P2
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.3a1
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: