539021 - Implement a system to profile awesomebar loading time

Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX

(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: General, defect)

Description

[Vivien Nicolas (:vingtetun) (:21) - (NOT reading bugmails, needinfo? please)]

I've a dirty patch for that. I need to update it to work on the current fennecmark

Comment 1

[Joel Maher ( :jmaher ) (UTC -8)]

would we need a pre loaded profile for this?  I would assume a 500 bookmark, 2000 website history would be good enough for this.  Would we just measure the time from urlbar tap to awesomebar display?

Also could we detect keystroke performance in the url bar during the load?  for example:

1) tap url bar
2) start type www.mozilla.org without waiting for awesomebar to load
3) measure the time it takes for www.mozilla.org to be displayed in the url bar
4) measure the time it takes to match an entry

Comment 2

[Vivien Nicolas (:vingtetun) (:21) - (NOT reading bugmails, needinfo? please)]

(In reply to comment #1)
> would we need a pre loaded profile for this?  I would assume a 500 bookmark,
> 2000 website history would be good enough for this.  Would we just measure the
> time from urlbar tap to awesomebar display?

Obviously, we need a pre-loaded profile.
Do you know where we can find any pre-ready profile?

> 
> Also could we detect keystroke performance in the url bar during the load?  for
> example:
> 
> 1) tap url bar
> 2) start type www.mozilla.org without waiting for awesomebar to load
> 3) measure the time it takes for www.mozilla.org to be displayed in the url bar
> 4) measure the time it takes to match an entry

yeah, we can.
I think my patch do something similar. I'll clean it before the end of the time if i get any time for that.

Comment 3

[Aakash Desai [:aakashd]]

Just a question, but how are you guys thinking about implementing the reporting structure for this? and will it be private or public?

Comment 4

[Vivien Nicolas (:vingtetun) (:21) - (NOT reading bugmails, needinfo? please)]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Just a question, but how are you guys thinking about implementing the reporting
> structure for this? and will it be private or public?

This bug blocks 538974 which is a fennecmark tracking bug

Comment 5

[Joel Maher ( :jmaher ) (UTC -8)]

this would be in Fennecmark (per comment #1), and if we decide to add this to talos, it would be a talos test and the reporting,tracking would be just like all other talos stuff.

Comment 6

[BMO Automation]

Closing all opened bug in a graveyard component