Open Bug 550500 Opened 12 years ago Updated 4 years ago
Mouse function needs to be adjusted to more reflect reality when double/triple-clicking
In the sendMouseEvent function: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/testing/mochitest/tests/SimpleTest/EventUtils.js#18 When we do a double-click for instance, we only generate 1 click with clickCount 2 and dblclick event, which is not what happens, when you do a real double-click. With a real double-click, you first get a click with clickCount 1, then a click with clickCount 2, then a dblclick event. This is probably the cause for bug 537968. So EventUtils.js should do something similar, to more reflect reality. Tests that could be affected by this change are: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/mozapps/downloads/tests/chrome/test_bug_429247.xul http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/style/test/test_pointer-events.html?force=1 http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/mozapps/downloads/tests/chrome/test_bug_429247.xul Stuff that use tree_shared.js: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/content/tests/widgets/tree_shared.js http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/content/tests/widgets/test_richlist_direction.xul http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/content/tests/browser/browser_bug295977_autoscroll_overflow.js http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/base/content/test/browser_pageInfo.js http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/base/content/test/browser_bug432599.js http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/base/content/test/browser_overflowScroll.js
This takes into effect what Neal wants with the function, commented in bug 537968, comment 9. I haven't tested this patch yet.
I uploaded a patch to the tryserver, but for some reason it failed on winmo or something: http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=MozillaTry I tested the patch with test_pointer-events.html, that worked at least.
Ok, builds are here: https://email@example.com/ But I'm more interested what Tinderbox says, regarding the tests.
Comment on attachment 430666 [details] [diff] [review] patch Tryserver tinderbox seems to be all green, so I guess this patch is ready for review.
Attachment #430666 - Flags: review?(enndeakin)
Sorry, tryserver just mailed me that some tests were failing: Summary of unittest results: check: 577/0 xpcshell-tests: 746/0 reftest: 4211/0/242 crashtest: 1484/0/10 mochitest-plain: 156662/<em class="testfail">4</em>/1345 mochitest-chrome: 8759/0/109 mochitest-browser-chrome: 4371/<em class="testfail">2</em>/3 mochitest-a11y: 13726/0/8 http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=MozillaTry/1267815208.1267824397.8599.gz 159687 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/toolkit/content/tests/widgets/test_tree.xul | cycleHeader column sortDirection - got "ascending", expected "" 160561 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/toolkit/content/tests/widgets/test_tree_hier.xul | cycleHeader column sortDirection - got "ascending", expected "" 161321 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/toolkit/content/tests/widgets/test_tree_hier_cell.xul | cycleHeader column sortDirection - got "ascending", expected "" 161858 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/toolkit/content/tests/widgets/test_tree_single.xul | cycleHeader column sortDirection - got "ascending", expected "" PROCESS-CRASH | automation.py | application crashed (minidump found) Thread 1 (crashed) PROCESS-CRASH | automation.py | application crashed (minidump found) Thread 1 (crashed) PROCESS-CRASH | automation.py | application crashed (minidump found) Thread 1 (crashed) TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochikit/content/browser/browser/base/content/test/browser_overflowScroll.js | Scrolled one page of tabs with a double click - Got 114, expected 16 TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochikit/content/browser/browser/base/content/test/browser_pageInfo.js | When the lock is clicked twice there should be only one page info dialog - Got 2, expected 1 At least some of those failures are files that I already mentioned, that could possibly cause test failures, so I have to look into these.
Martijn, have you had time in the last two weeks to check those failures?
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.