Closed Bug 550842 Opened 14 years ago Closed 14 years ago

need to ensure proper alignement of memory arena for RuleProcessorData::operator new

Categories

(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect)

Sun
NetBSD
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Tracking Status
status1.9.2 --- .5-fixed

People

(Reporter: martin, Assigned: martin)

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

RuleProcessorData contains a pointer, so on alignment critical architectures needs to be properly aligned.
So this is the problem bug 518003 comment 5 talks about, right?

Martin, is that patch not ready for review?  Or did you just forget to request review?
Attachment #431063 - Flags: review?
yes, I wasn't aware of that comment in #518003 (and didn't know whom to ask for review, but apparently I could request w/o requestee)
Comment on attachment 431063 [details] [diff] [review]
Ensure pointer alignement for RuleProcessorData::operator new

Asking no one in particular doesn't actually let anyone know about the review request, though I think there are people who query for these.

But in any case, I'm the right reviewer for this.  ;)
Attachment #431063 - Flags: review? → review+
Assignee: nobody → martin
Pushed that patch as http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/0905374b063d and then pushed http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1008f5c2e057 to fix the resulting compile errors.

Is this needed on branches?
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Requesting branch approval.  Risk is very low, and this should fix crashes on some architectures.
Attachment #431431 - Flags: approval1.9.2.3?
Comment on attachment 431431 [details] [diff] [review]
1.9.2 branch merge

a=LegNeato for 1.9.2.5. Please ONLY land this on mozilla-1.9.2 default, as we are still working on 1.9.2.4 on the relbranch
Attachment #431431 - Flags: approval1.9.2.4? → approval1.9.2.5+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: