550886 - Add Mac OSX 10.6 64bits to TBPL

Status: VERIFIED FIXED

(Tree Management Graveyard :: TBPL, defect)

Description

[Armen [:armenzg]]

Once we have 10.6 builds we will attach the patch and pass it to webtools for review, landing and deploying.

Comment 1

[Armen [:armenzg]]

It seems that this is coming up very fast and we will soon be having 10.6 64 bits builds.

Passing it to Webdev.

Webdev can you please add 10.6-x64 bits to TBPL?

Comment 2

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

10.6 64bit builds are nearly ready - any chance of getting TBPL to display these?

Comment 3

[Arpad Borsos [:Swatinem]]

http://hg.swatinem.de/tinderboxpushlog/rev/b84205110e08
This should do it, although I haven't tested it.
Markus: please pull.

Comment 4

[Markus Stange [:mstange]]

Thanks!
http://hg.mozilla.org/users/mstange_themasta.com/tinderboxpushlog/rev/b84205110e08

Comment 5

[Armen [:armenzg]]

Hi!
We have enabled the 10.6 builds yesterday and I can see it in the bottom area of TBPL but I don't see it on the individual rows for each developer's checkin.

Could you please add as well this feature?

The names of the builders on the tinderbox page are like this:
* OS X 10.6.2 mozilla-central leak test build
* OS X 10.6.2 mozilla-central debug test mochitests-4/5
* OS X 10.6.2 mozilla-central build
* OS X 10.6.2 mozilla-central opt test mochitests-4/5

Thanks!

Comment 6

[Markus Stange [:mstange]]

You probably need to enable scraping on those machines. Somebody mentioned how to do that in some other bug which I can't find right now...
Tinderboxpushlog only shows those builds that print the revision they're based on with "rev:<changeset>" in their scrape, so without scraping it doesn't work.

Are these 10.6 machines running 64bit builds?

Comment 7

[Armen [:armenzg]]

(In reply to comment #6)
> You probably need to enable scraping on those machines. Somebody mentioned how
> to do that in some other bug which I can't find right now...
> Tinderboxpushlog only shows those builds that print the revision they're based
> on with "rev:<changeset>" in their scrape, so without scraping it doesn't work.
> 
I will look into it. Thanks!

> Are these 10.6 machines running 64bit builds?
Yes, they are.

Comment 8

[Markus Stange [:mstange]]

(In reply to comment #7)
> > Are these 10.6 machines running 64bit builds?
> Yes, they are.

Interesting, then we need to change the name matching so that they'll get sorted into the right column in status table on the bottom right.

Comment 9

[Markus Stange [:mstange]]

I've pushed http://hg.mozilla.org/users/mstange_themasta.com/tinderboxpushlog/rev/a89d92fed054 so that the 10.6 Talos machines get listed under "OS X 64".

Comment 10

[Armen [:armenzg]]

Good. I see the T's beside "OS X 64".
I don't see the Bo and Bd icons; will they show up later?

Markus, I would also like to bring some discussion wrt to 64 bits platforms (Linux64, Mac64 and Win7x64) unit testing the 32 bits and 64 bits builds AND talos testing the 32bits and 64 bits builds.
This is not happening at the current moment but might come down the road.
Where can we have that discussion? which mailing list?

Comment 11

[Markus Stange [:mstange]]

(In reply to comment #10)
> I don't see the Bo and Bd icons; will they show up later?

They will show up when there was a build that had scraping enabled.

> Markus, I would also like to bring some discussion wrt to 64 bits platforms
> (Linux64, Mac64 and Win7x64) unit testing the 32 bits and 64 bits builds AND
> talos testing the 32bits and 64 bits builds.
> This is not happening at the current moment but might come down the road.
> Where can we have that discussion? which mailing list?

mozilla.dev.tree-management maybe, or mozilla.dev.platform... not sure

Comment 12

[Armen [:armenzg]]

(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > I don't see the Bo and Bd icons; will they show up later?
> 
> They will show up when there was a build that had scraping enabled.
> 
I think scraping can be enabled from the tinderbox administration page. I have enabled the "scrape" column for:
* OS X 10.6.2 mozilla-central leak test build
* OS X 10.6.2 mozilla-central build
Let's see later if this starts working.

> > Markus, I would also like to bring some discussion wrt to 64 bits platforms
> > (Linux64, Mac64 and Win7x64) unit testing the 32 bits and 64 bits builds AND
> > talos testing the 32bits and 64 bits builds.
> > This is not happening at the current moment but might come down the road.
> > Where can we have that discussion? which mailing list?
> 
> mozilla.dev.tree-management maybe, or mozilla.dev.platform... not sure
Will do.

Comment 13

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

We are now generating 10.6 64bit builds and reporting them on http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=Firefox, but they are not being reported in TBPL.

Comment 14

[Armen [:armenzg]]

I see the first build with revision:
  s: moz2-darwin10-slave37
  rev:47cee476df16 (↓)
  Z:0B
but don't see the entry for it on TBPL.
Anything else I should try?

Comment 15

[Markus Stange [:mstange]]

I'll investigate.

Comment 16

[Markus Stange [:mstange]]

I wasn't looking at the builder's names when I changed the name detection for the 10.6 Talos boxen...
Should be working now.

http://hg.mozilla.org/users/mstange_themasta.com/tinderboxpushlog/rev/fa02d9d787c5

Comment 17

[Armen [:armenzg]]

Thanks Markus!
This works well.