Closed Bug 551233 Opened 15 years ago Closed 15 years ago

Workers: Possible to release nsGlobalWindow on a background thread

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Tracking Status
blocking1.9.2 --- needed
status1.9.2 --- .4-fixed
blocking1.9.1 --- needed
status1.9.1 --- .10-fixed

People

(Reporter: bent.mozilla, Assigned: bent.mozilla)

Details

(Whiteboard: [sg:moderate] [qa-noaction-191] [qa-noaction-192])

Attachments

(1 file)

Attached patch PatchSplinter Review
I'm utterly surprised, but the nsISupportsHashKey implementation actually addrefs/releases its key value when used. Simple fix.
Attachment #431415 - Flags: superreview?(jst)
Attachment #431415 - Flags: review?(jst)
Attachment #431415 - Flags: superreview?(jst)
Attachment #431415 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #431415 - Flags: review?(jst)
Attachment #431415 - Flags: review+
Attachment #431415 - Flags: approval1.9.2.2?
Attachment #431415 - Flags: approval1.9.1.9?
Whiteboard: [sg:moderate]
Comment on attachment 431415 [details] [diff] [review] Patch We're code frozen on 1.9.1.9 and 1.9.2.2, so moving these to the next version. This will need to land and bake on trunk, first.
Attachment #431415 - Flags: approval1.9.2.3?
Attachment #431415 - Flags: approval1.9.2.2?
Attachment #431415 - Flags: approval1.9.1.9?
Attachment #431415 - Flags: approval1.9.1.10?
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
blocking1.9.1: ? → needed
blocking1.9.2: ? → needed
Attachment #431415 - Flags: approval1.9.2.3?
Attachment #431415 - Flags: approval1.9.2.3+
Attachment #431415 - Flags: approval1.9.1.10?
Attachment #431415 - Flags: approval1.9.1.10+
Please don't remove the "needed" part from the blocking1.9.2/1.9.1 flags. That means something to drivers and should be left alone.
blocking1.9.1: --- → ?
blocking1.9.2: --- → ?
I'm guessing that was an accident ... /me shakesfist at bugzilla!
blocking1.9.1: ? → needed
blocking1.9.2: ? → needed
Is there anything for QA to verify with this bug? I suspect not.
(In reply to comment #7) > Is there anything for QA to verify with this bug? I suspect not. Yeah, not really. I just magically hit it one day... It requires precise timing.
Whiteboard: [sg:moderate] → [sg:moderate] [qa-noaction-191] [qa-noaction-192]
Group: core-security
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: