Closed
Bug 55296
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
URL parameter is ignored
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Cmd-line Features, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: burnus, Assigned: radha)
References
Details
(Keywords: relnote, Whiteboard: [rtm-])
Hi this with 2000-10-04-21/Linux.
using "$A_PATH/mozilla url" with url=file:///foo/bar or with url=http://bar/foo
don't work anymore.
I think it worked two or three days ago.
Hope this till get "rtm" -- if confirmed.
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
timeless/asa, either of you see this (trunk or branch)?
Yep, but I might have forced it on myself
bin>mozilla.exe -console http://java.sun.com
prefs: when-nav-starts-display: blank page.
also prefs: when-nav-starts-display: homepage page.
win32, 10/06-04 talkback
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
sorry, i should have clarified my question:
* could you pls give me specific steps to repro this? thx!
* when was the last build you used when this worked? if it's a regression,
getting even a rough idea as to when this last worked would help us narrow it
down.
* timeless: talkback? it crashed? tobias didn't mention any thing about a crash
originally. pls clarify.
thanks a bunch!
no, sorry.. that's my format for mozilla version, it means:
mozilla-win32-talkback.zip build id 2000100604
I mention talkback because occasionally the other packages behave differently; I
omit 2000 because it's not really important in dated comments.
I still don't understand the bug here. Please clarify with some simpler or more
obvious steps.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
I try to explain it:
If you run "mozilla" with an URL as command(line) parameter, Mozilla used to
start and load this URL. Under unix this is shell script which calles
mozilla-bin.
mozilla --help shows:
Usage: /usr/local/share/mozilla/package/mozilla-bin [ options ... ] [URL]
where options include:
[...]
This becomes usefull (a) if you use the xterm terminal (or the command.com under
Windows e.g. together with "start") and (b) if another program starts mozilla
with "$PATH/mozilla %u" where %u is the URL.
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
thanks, Tobias... i tried the following using 2000.10.09.09-n6 [opt comm branch]
bits on linux:
1. in an xterm, issued "./netscape http://www.kith.org" [without quotes, of
course].
2. [if you have more than 1 profile, the profile manager will appear. just
select one of the profiles then click the start button. otherwise, this step
isn't needed.]
observation: the browser launches, opening at http://www.kith.org.
true, i'm using a commercial [and branch] build, but perhaps you should use
./mozilla instead of mozilla-bin? does that help, or am i still misunderstanding
the problem?
or, perhaps this is indeed a regression --am guessing in the trunk, since i
haven't been using those builds recently. ;(
Marking this "rtm-" since it looks like a trunk problem.
Assignee: don → radha
Whiteboard: [rtm-]
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
Using 2000-10-10-21/Linux (Mozilla nightly) I cannot reproduce it anymore. That
is: It works for me (marking as such).
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
reopening this is still a problem on the trunk. perhaps the reporter tested a
branch build. burnus@gmx.de (Tobias Burnus), did you get your build from an
Mtrunk directory or an MN6 directory (or the /latest dir?) If you used latest or
MN6 then you probably got a branch build where this is not a problem.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
| Reporter | ||
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
Nice to get to know how to check it (I used only wget with latest).
I think from looking at http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/
that I got 2000-10-10-21-Mtrunk. Is there any methode to be sure (from about: or
the UI?)
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
yeah, the directory name from which you get the build is the best high-level way
to know whether it's branch or trunk. [Mtrunk is the right one, for this case.]
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 56104 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
If this is a trunk only problem, it doesn't need a relnote. Can someone confirm
that, and remove the keywords? Or, if it is a branch problem also:
It seems unclear to me whether this bug requires either of a "developer" or
"user" release note for Netscape 6 RTM. If anyone feels it does, can they please
draft one and then nominate with the relnote-user or relnote-devel strings in
the Status Whiteboard.
Thanks :-)
Gerv
Comment 15•25 years ago
|
||
OK, this is actually working for me on trunk builds from today (102508) and
branch builds from yesterday (102408). I think I was mistaken in reopening this
bug the other day. I'm not positive but I probably put a "-" in front of the
URL. Reresolving as Worksforme.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
mass verification of WorksForMe bugs: to find all bugspam pertaining to this,
set your search string to "IfItWorksForSlappyTheSquirrelThenItWFM".
if you think this particular bug is *still* an open issue, please make sure of
the following before reopening:
a. that it's still a problem with ***recent trunk builds*** on the all
appropriate platform[s]
b. provide clear steps to reproduce (unless a good test case is already in the
bug report), making sure it pertains to the original problem (avoid morphing as
much as possible :)
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•