Closed
Bug 55296
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
URL parameter is ignored
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Cmd-line Features, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: burnus, Assigned: radha)
References
Details
(Keywords: relnote, Whiteboard: [rtm-])
Hi this with 2000-10-04-21/Linux. using "$A_PATH/mozilla url" with url=file:///foo/bar or with url=http://bar/foo don't work anymore. I think it worked two or three days ago. Hope this till get "rtm" -- if confirmed.
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
timeless/asa, either of you see this (trunk or branch)?
Yep, but I might have forced it on myself bin>mozilla.exe -console http://java.sun.com prefs: when-nav-starts-display: blank page. also prefs: when-nav-starts-display: homepage page. win32, 10/06-04 talkback
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
sorry, i should have clarified my question: * could you pls give me specific steps to repro this? thx! * when was the last build you used when this worked? if it's a regression, getting even a rough idea as to when this last worked would help us narrow it down. * timeless: talkback? it crashed? tobias didn't mention any thing about a crash originally. pls clarify. thanks a bunch!
no, sorry.. that's my format for mozilla version, it means: mozilla-win32-talkback.zip build id 2000100604 I mention talkback because occasionally the other packages behave differently; I omit 2000 because it's not really important in dated comments.
I still don't understand the bug here. Please clarify with some simpler or more obvious steps.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
I try to explain it: If you run "mozilla" with an URL as command(line) parameter, Mozilla used to start and load this URL. Under unix this is shell script which calles mozilla-bin. mozilla --help shows: Usage: /usr/local/share/mozilla/package/mozilla-bin [ options ... ] [URL] where options include: [...] This becomes usefull (a) if you use the xterm terminal (or the command.com under Windows e.g. together with "start") and (b) if another program starts mozilla with "$PATH/mozilla %u" where %u is the URL.
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
thanks, Tobias... i tried the following using 2000.10.09.09-n6 [opt comm branch] bits on linux: 1. in an xterm, issued "./netscape http://www.kith.org" [without quotes, of course]. 2. [if you have more than 1 profile, the profile manager will appear. just select one of the profiles then click the start button. otherwise, this step isn't needed.] observation: the browser launches, opening at http://www.kith.org. true, i'm using a commercial [and branch] build, but perhaps you should use ./mozilla instead of mozilla-bin? does that help, or am i still misunderstanding the problem? or, perhaps this is indeed a regression --am guessing in the trunk, since i haven't been using those builds recently. ;(
Marking this "rtm-" since it looks like a trunk problem.
Assignee: don → radha
Whiteboard: [rtm-]
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
Using 2000-10-10-21/Linux (Mozilla nightly) I cannot reproduce it anymore. That is: It works for me (marking as such).
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
reopening this is still a problem on the trunk. perhaps the reporter tested a branch build. burnus@gmx.de (Tobias Burnus), did you get your build from an Mtrunk directory or an MN6 directory (or the /latest dir?) If you used latest or MN6 then you probably got a branch build where this is not a problem.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
Nice to get to know how to check it (I used only wget with latest). I think from looking at http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/ that I got 2000-10-10-21-Mtrunk. Is there any methode to be sure (from about: or the UI?)
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
yeah, the directory name from which you get the build is the best high-level way to know whether it's branch or trunk. [Mtrunk is the right one, for this case.]
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 56104 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
If this is a trunk only problem, it doesn't need a relnote. Can someone confirm that, and remove the keywords? Or, if it is a branch problem also: It seems unclear to me whether this bug requires either of a "developer" or "user" release note for Netscape 6 RTM. If anyone feels it does, can they please draft one and then nominate with the relnote-user or relnote-devel strings in the Status Whiteboard. Thanks :-) Gerv
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
OK, this is actually working for me on trunk builds from today (102508) and branch builds from yesterday (102408). I think I was mistaken in reopening this bug the other day. I'm not positive but I probably put a "-" in front of the URL. Reresolving as Worksforme.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 16•23 years ago
|
||
mass verification of WorksForMe bugs: to find all bugspam pertaining to this, set your search string to "IfItWorksForSlappyTheSquirrelThenItWFM". if you think this particular bug is *still* an open issue, please make sure of the following before reopening: a. that it's still a problem with ***recent trunk builds*** on the all appropriate platform[s] b. provide clear steps to reproduce (unless a good test case is already in the bug report), making sure it pertains to the original problem (avoid morphing as much as possible :)
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•