User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:18.104.22.168) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:22.214.171.124) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3 With the following code, the richlistbox horizontal scrollbar is still ltr (left positioned per default) although it should be right positioned. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <?xml-stylesheet href="chrome://global/skin/" type="text/css"?> <window xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns="http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul" dir="rtl"> <hbox flex="1" style="direction: rtl;"> <richlistbox style="width: 100px; direction: rtl;"> <item>this is a really really really really long test sentence.</item> </richlistbox> <splitter/> <browser flex="1" src="" type="content-primary"/> </hbox> </window> Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Cut&paste the give XUL code in a file. 2. Open it with FF (for example) 3. Play with the splitter Actual Results: Richlistbox horizontal scrollbar is left positioned. Expected Results: Richlistbox horizontal scrollbar right positioned.
Fixed by bug 508816. Ehsan, do you think this is covered by the existing tests, or does it need its own testcase?
Assignee: nobody → smontagu
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
(In reply to comment #1) > Fixed by bug 508816. Ehsan, do you think this is covered by the existing tests, > or does it need its own testcase? Let's get a specific test for this, since otherwise we'd be relying on implementation details... Do you want me to write the test?
(In reply to comment #2) > Do you want me to write the test? That would be awesome :)
Created attachment 510795 [details] [diff] [review] Test case
Attachment #510795 - Flags: review?(smontagu)
Comment on attachment 510795 [details] [diff] [review] Test case smart move removing the "." from the <item> text to ensure that the test fails without bug 508816.
Attachment #510795 - Flags: review?(smontagu) → review+
Flags: in-testsuite? → in-testsuite+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.