Closed
Bug 564968
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Crash [@ nsOverflowContinuationTracker::SetUpListWalker] with -moz-column
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P2)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.9.3a5
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
blocking2.0 | --- | final+ |
status1.9.2 | --- | unaffected |
status1.9.1 | --- | unaffected |
People
(Reporter: jruderman, Assigned: MatsPalmgren_bugz)
References
Details
(4 keywords)
Crash Data
Attachments
(5 files)
766 bytes,
application/xhtml+xml
|
Details | |
7.44 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
9.58 KB,
text/html
|
Details | |
3.87 KB,
patch
|
fantasai.bugs
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
4.74 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
###!!! ASSERTION: Expected out-of-flow frame: 'aDeletedFrame->GetStateBits() & NS_FRAME_OUT_OF_FLOW', file layout/generic/nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 5159 ###!!! ASSERTION: Destroying float without removing from a child list.: 'Error', file layout/generic/nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 4835 Crash [@ nsOverflowContinuationTracker::SetUpListWalker] Based on layout/reftests/bugs/379349-2b.xhtml.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
![]() |
||
Updated•14 years ago
|
blocking2.0: --- → ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
The bug is in DoRemoveFrame; we're calling it with aDeletedFrame=0x1721b80 (cyan), iterating the lines we find it and its next-in-flow 0x17414b8 (blue) and destroy them, then exit the loop and recurse DoRemoveFrame with 0x17430a0 (red) which is an overflow container, which now doesn't have a prev-in-flow anymore since we just destroyed them, hence the assertion and crash...
Assignee: nobody → matspal
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
There is a check for overflow container next-in-flows before the loop, I think we should just move it inside the loop.
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #447453 -
Flags: review?(fantasai.bugs)
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
blocking2.0: ? → final+
Priority: -- → P2
Comment on attachment 447453 [details] [diff] [review] wip1 Seems pretty reasonable to me. Use presContext() instead of calling ->PresContext(), though.
Attachment #447453 -
Flags: review?(fantasai.bugs) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ffcb26b63cfc
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.3a5
Updated•13 years ago
|
Crash Signature: [@ nsOverflowContinuationTracker::SetUpListWalker]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•