Closed Bug 567600 Opened 16 years ago Closed 16 years ago

website changes for the 0.4 release

Categories

(Add-on SDK Graveyard :: General, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: dietrich, Assigned: dietrich)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

No description provided.
Blocks: 566901
Attached patch v1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
- add the 0.4 news snippet - s/reboot// in a couple of urls - less defensive explanation of jetpack vis a vis legacy extension dev in the faq
Assignee: nobody → dietrich
Attachment #446931 - Flags: review?(myk)
Comment on attachment 446931 [details] [diff] [review] v1 >- <b>A:</b> If the Jetpack SDK built-in library provides enough APIs to enable the majority of functionality that existing add-ons require, then weâll talk about whether we'll deprecate XUL-based extensions. If the Jetpack API doesnât provide the flexibility or feature you need because of the extensible library system, youâll be able to write your own module to add that capability.</p> >+ <b>A:</b> The intent of the Jetpack SDK is to provide enough APIs to enable the majority of functionality that existing add-ons require. If the Jetpack API doesnât provide the flexibility or feature you need, youâll be able to write your own module to add that capability.</p> Yup, reads better, although it still feels like a bit of a dodge, since the direct answer to the question is that we have no plans to deprecate traditional XUL add-ons (although that could always change). >- <li><a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Labs/Jetpack/Reboot/JEP">Propose</a> a new API</li> >+ <li><a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Labs/Jetpack/JEP">Propose</a> a new API</li> Good catch! > var messages = [ >+ 'Jetpack SDK 0.4 has been released! <a href="https://jetpack.mozillalabs.com/sdk/latest/docs/#guide/getting-started">Get started now with the SDK.</a>', > 'Jetpack SDK 0.3 has been released! <a href="https://jetpack.mozillalabs.com/sdk/latest/docs/#guide/getting-started">Get started now with the SDK.</a>', Nit: the 0.3 news item should be removed.
Attachment #446931 - Flags: review?(myk) → review+
Attached patch v2Splinter Review
- fixes some typos and grammar problems - removes/clarifies some incorrect statements - some linebreaks in the source to ease editing
Attachment #446931 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #447168 - Flags: review?(myk)
Comment on attachment 447168 [details] [diff] [review] v2 Three cheers for line breaks!
Attachment #447168 - Flags: review?(myk) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
The Add-on SDK is no longer a Mozilla Labs experiment and has become a big enough project to warrant its own Bugzilla product, so the "Add-on SDK" product has been created for it, and I am moving its bugs to that product. To filter bugmail related to this change, filter on the word "looptid".
Component: Jetpack SDK → General
Product: Mozilla Labs → Add-on SDK
QA Contact: jetpack-sdk → general
Version: Trunk → unspecified
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: