Closed
Bug 568682
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Review and land FlightDeck addon on Jetpack SDK
Categories
(Add-on SDK Graveyard :: General, defect)
Add-on SDK Graveyard
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: avarma, Assigned: avarma)
Details
So far, the FlightDeck addon has existed alongside many other random experimental packages in my atul-packages repo:
http://hg.mozilla.org/users/avarma_mozilla.com/atul-packages/file/836952bb64d3/packages/flightdeck
I'd like to move it so it's under the hg.mozilla.org/labs umbrella. One option is to give it its own repository, and another is to just bundle it with the jetpack sdk in its 'packages' directory.
The latter would be easiest, simply b/c the flightdeck addon is so coupled to the jetpack SDK that it would be good to keep it in sync with the rest of the SDK's code and run their unit tests together. it should also be a fairly small addon, so not much of an additional burden on the jetpack sdk code. since flightdeck is going to be renamed the 'addon builder' anyways, it seems to fit in thematically as a part of the core development infrastructure for addons, rather than as a random third-party addon.
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Yeah, makes sense to have it with the SDK code.
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Did this happen? Where's the canonical home for the source code now that we've moved over to github? Probably time to close this bug either way.
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
I don't think this happened. Now that we're moving to Git and hosting our canonical repositories on GitHub for the time being, the canonical repository for this addon should live on GitHub, but in a central location, like http://github.com/mozilla/addon-builder-helper/.
Atul: can you make this happen?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Ack, sorry I missed this.
the current "canonical" location is here:
http://github.com/toolness/addons-builder-helper
I can move it to mozilla/addon-builder-helper, but what about reviewing and landing it on mozilla/addon-sdk? Is that non-optimal now?
| Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → avarma
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
The Add-on SDK is no longer a Mozilla Labs experiment and has become a big enough project to warrant its own Bugzilla product, so the "Add-on SDK" product has been created for it, and I am moving its bugs to that product.
To filter bugmail related to this change, filter on the word "looptid".
Component: Jetpack SDK → General
Product: Mozilla Labs → Add-on SDK
QA Contact: jetpack-sdk → general
Version: Trunk → unspecified
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Since myk landed the addon on github yesterday, I'm assuming we wontfix this.
https://github.com/mozilla/addon-builder-helper
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•