Closed
Bug 573127
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
"ASSERTION: Why did this not get handled while processing mRestyleRoots?" with mathvariant
Categories
(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla2.0b1
People
(Reporter: jruderman, Assigned: bzbarsky)
References
Details
(Keywords: assertion, regression, testcase)
Attachments
(2 files)
465 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
1.51 KB,
patch
|
dbaron
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
There are lots of ways to trigger this assertion. I have semi-reduced testcases for lots of them.
###!!! ASSERTION: Why did this not get handled while processing mRestyleRoots?: '!element->HasFlag(collector->tracker->RootBit()) || (element->GetFlattenedTreeParent() && !element->GetFlattenedTreeParent()->GetPrimaryFrame()) || (aData.mChangeHint & nsChangeHint_ReconstructFrame)', file /builds/slave/mozilla-central-macosx-debug/build/layout/base/RestyleTracker.cpp, line 114
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Yeah, ok. The assert needs a small adjustment to make it match reality.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 452414 [details] [diff] [review]
Like so
r=dbaron, though it's getting to be a pretty confusing assertion
Attachment #452414 -
Flags: review?(dbaron) → review+
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Yeah, the problem is it's trying to catch cases when flags would be removed "incorrectly", and those cases are complicated. :(
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Pushed:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/13a9aecb404f
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/fe16c033cfa7
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.3a6
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•