Closed Bug 577914 Opened 14 years ago Closed 13 years ago

mark DEBUG only variables as ifdef DEBUG in layout

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

x86
macOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla5

People

(Reporter: timeless, Assigned: timeless)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

this is part of a crusade to get rid of compilation warnings
Attached patch patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Assignee: nobody → timeless
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #456741 - Flags: review?(dbaron)
This makes the code pretty unreadable; I don't think this is worth it to get rid of compiler warnings.
Comment on attachment 456741 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

see previous comment
Attachment #456741 - Flags: review?(dbaron) → review-
An alternative that might be a *little* more readable would be a general NS_IF_DEBUG() macro that makes its argument appear ifdef debug, and disappear otherwise, so you'd write:

  NS_IF_DEBUG(nsIContent* propagatedScrollFrom =) PropagateScrollToViewport();

It still makes our code a lot less approachable to outsiders, though, so I'm not especially happy about that, either.
Attachment #456741 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #463501 - Flags: review?(dbaron)
Summary: use NS_DEBUG_ASSIGN for layout → mark DEBUG only variables as ifdef DEBUG in layout
Attachment #463501 - Flags: approval2.0?
Comment on attachment 463501 [details] [diff] [review]
using #ifdef DEBUG

This should land after we branch for Gecko 2.0 / Firefox 4.
Attachment #463501 - Flags: approval2.0? → approval2.0-
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/03c135d7887a
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla2.2
Did we really want to do this (and the other similar patches for other modules that just landed as well) at this point, in view of the work-in-progress in bug 577899?
(In reply to comment #8)
> Did we really want to do this (and the other similar patches for other modules
> that just landed as well) at this point, in view of the work-in-progress in bug
> 577899?

These patches were reviewed, that's why I landed them.  I personally didn't know about bug 577899 before this, but I'm not sure what we want to do now (back all of those patches out, switch them over to NS_DEBUG_ONLY, etc).
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: