Closed
Bug 580982
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Matroska VP8+Vorbis works, only WebM should
Categories
(Core :: Audio/Video, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
blocking2.0 | --- | beta4+ |
People
(Reporter: foolip, Assigned: kinetik)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
276.52 KB,
patch
|
cajbir
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.70
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; en-US; rv:2.0b1) Gecko/20100630 Firefox/4.0b1
Reported by nzasch at https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/group/webm-discuss/browse_thread/thread/2a44b0ee33b39b13#
Opera has already dropped support for the matroska doctype.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Visit http://storage.arav.ventuordici.org/test/pippo6.webm
Actual Results:
Video plays
Expected Results:
Video shouldn't play
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Philip, I assume you haven't had much trouble with YouTube videos still using the "matroska" document type, or the V_MS/VFW/FOURCC codec ID?
Here's the proposed fix for libnestegg: http://github.com/kinetiknz/nestegg/commit/dfc6af19cd9729b32d2cd91a2470eb9ebe9e69bf
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Nominating for 2.0. We should make sure this is fixed before 2.0 final, otherwise it will become increasingly difficult to fix it if people are producing invalid files.
blocking2.0: --- → ?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Matthew, I haven't seen any bug reports of playback problems on YouTube in Opera that I've linked back to not handling "matroska" doctype or V_MS/VFW/FOURCC.
blocking2.0: ? → beta4+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Oops, those libnestegg weren't sufficient. Here's the rest of the changes: http://github.com/kinetiknz/nestegg/commit/844b8bc7695e2d60ad7bde3fb5105c0b24304640
Attached is a roll-up patch for mozilla-central. Includes mochitest with copy of seek.webm with matroska doctype.
I wonder if it's worth treating SimpleBlocks (and other Matroska v2 elements) as unknown elements if the doctype version is 2.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #463052 -
Flags: review?(chris.double) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [needs landing]
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [needs landing]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•