Closed
Bug 582370
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Give AppTabs their own icons on taskbar
Categories
(Firefox :: General, enhancement)
Firefox
General
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 596648
People
(Reporter: Terepin, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b3pre) Gecko/20100727 Minefield/4.0b3pre
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b3pre) Gecko/20100727 Minefield/4.0b3pre
Currently the AppTabs are showed in Aero Peek previews. This is wrong behaviour, as the AppTabs are not standard web pages, but web applications, which cause confusion.
Reproducible: Always
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Blocks: pinnedtabs
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
I don't understand how this would cause confusion. If anything, it's a loss of functionality for the user.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
It is confusing to me, and I'm experienced user. It seems inlogical to me having AppTabs in Aero Peek. We are trying to distinguish AppTabs from normal tabs as possible, yet we keeping them in previews? That is inconsistent.
![]() |
||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Severity: normal → enhancement
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
This would make sense if the AppTabs each appeared as separate icons on the task bar. That would farther distinguish AppTabs from normal tabs and increase the ease of accessing those tabs from outside Firefox.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
That's a great idea! Rob, do you think it's possible?
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
I know we can already give windows their own icon on the taskbar. There might be a trick to let us do it with tabs.
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
OS: Windows 7 → All
Summary: AppTabs should be excluded from Aero Peek → Give AppTabs their own icons on taskbar
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
This and Bug 596648 are essentially the same. I'm not sure which should be duped to which.
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
Dupe this to bug 605222?
![]() |
||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•14 years ago
|
||
May I new why my bug was marked duplicate when I filled it almost two months earlier?
![]() |
||
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9)
> May I new why my bug was marked duplicate when I filled it almost two months
> earlier?
The other bug was setup better on dependencies, and no work was done on either so it doesn't make any difference which we keep.
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
Oh, OK.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•