Closed
Bug 582850
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
permanent orange test on 64-bit win7: REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-size-2x2.jpg
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla2.0b4
People
(Reporter: m_kato, Assigned: m_kato)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
3.68 KB,
patch
|
joe
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox/1280330675.1280331946.10143.gz
JPEG decoder on 64-bit Win doesn't use SSE2 version. So I think that this orange occurs. We should not set fails-if on 64-bt Win.
Also I believe that these test failures are same season.
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-size-2x2.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-size-5x5.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-size-7x7.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-size-9x9.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-size-15x15.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-size-16x16.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-size-17x17.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-size-31x31.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-size-32x32.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-size-33x33.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-progressive.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-gray.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-cmyk-1.jpg |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central-w764-opt-u-reftest/build/reftest/tests/modules/libpr0n/test/reftest/jpeg/jpg-cmyk-2.jpg |
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #461504 -
Flags: review?(joe)
It might make more sense to test *only* http.oscpu (or perhaps xr.XPCOMABI), since this really doesn't have anything to do with what widget code we're using.
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 461504 [details] [diff] [review]
fix
I'm OK with this, but if you want to change it to check only http.oscpu, I'm ok with that too.
Attachment #461504 -
Flags: review?(joe) → review+
Given that there are a bunch of ifdefs in mozilla/jpeg that say:
#if defined(XP_WIN32) && defined(_M_IX86) && !defined(__GNUC__)
...
#endif
and I suspect those are the ones responsible, I think the right test here is probably:
fails-if(xr.XPCOMABI=="WINNT_x86-msvc")
I have this in my patch queue ready to land. (I actually meant xulRuntime.XPCOMABI , which is what I'm using.)
Assignee: nobody → m_kato
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla2.0b4
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•