Closed
Bug 58539
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
window.scrollbars.visible -> ns_error_failure 0x80004005
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla0.9
People
(Reporter: jruderman, Assigned: danm.moz)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: dom0)
Attachments
(1 file)
11.45 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Trying to access window.scrollbars.visible gives a NS_ERROR_FAILURE. It's
supposed to return a boolean, although I'm not sure when it's true and when
it's false.
Confusing 4.x documentation:
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/communicator/jsref/win1.htm#1187502
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
Dan, could you look into this, ScrollbarsPropImpl::SetVisible() and
::GetVisible() currently only return NS_ERROR_FAILURE, they need to access the
window flags passed to window.open() to determine if the window has scrollbars
enabled or not. Brendan, correct me if my understanding of scrillbars.visible is
incorrect.
Assignee: jst → danm
Oops! Scrollbars were never hooked up to their windowprops, were they? At least
n access attempt returns a nice error.
To answer Jesse's question, once these are hooked up, the accessor will return
FALSE if scrollbars are disabled, meaning the content area will never show
scrollbars no matter what the content, and TRUE if they're enabled, meaning the
content area may or may not actually be showing a scrollbar, depending on the
size of its contents. I'm not quite sure if that's the exact behaviour of Nav 4
and IE, but it's what we can do and it seems reasonable.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9
After further investigation, it turns out that in Nav 4.74 (windows),
scrollbars.visible is always true in a window with enabled scrollbars, even if
they're not currently visible. (And IE (5) doesn't support the feature, so
there's no help there.)
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
testcase URL:
http://gemal.dk/browserspy/showprop.html?window.scrollbars
"uncaught exception" on build 20010130
*** Bug 67181 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I'm attaching a mostly straightforward implementation. The one tweaky thing is
the modification to nsContentTreeOwner::GetInterface; asking it to go to the
root nsContentTreeOwner when asked for nsIWebBrowserChrome, rather than
volunteering itself. Makes sense, but wants extra review. The rest of the patch
just rips out the unnecessary special-case code implementing the ability to open
a window without scrollbars, and implements the general case.
Keywords: patch
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
I just have to reopen this one. I no longer get the "ns_error_failure" error but
the results are a bit weird (I think).
The documentation says:
"The value of the scrollbars property itself has one property, visible. If true,
both scrollbars are visible; if false, they are hidden."
But if you go to:
http://gemal.dk/browserspy/showprop.html?window.scrollbars
and the scrollbars doesn't show because the browser window is large enough to
show the page content shouldn't the scrollbar.visible be false?
Currrently the visible seems to be true all the time. Is this another or is
there something that I misunderstood?
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
See my comments above, dated 2000-12-14 and 2000-12-19.
On the plus side, hyatt plans to check in a change to make scrollbars always
visible, even if they're disabled, as IE does.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•