Closed
Bug 585695
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
ecma/TypeConversion/9.5-2.js fails on Windows 64-bit
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 597814
People
(Reporter: dbaron, Assigned: m_kato)
References
Details
(Keywords: intermittent-failure)
Attachments
(1 file)
882 bytes,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox/1281357827.1281359049.19738.gz REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central_w764_test-jsreftest/build/jsreftest/tests/jsreftest.html?test=ecma/TypeConversion/9.5-2.js | Number.MIN_VALUE << 0 wrong value item 8 REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | file:///C:/talos-slave/mozilla-central_w764_test-jsreftest/build/jsreftest/tests/jsreftest.html?test=ecma/TypeConversion/9.5-2.js | -Number.MIN_VALUE << 0 wrong value item 9 This is probably a persistent failure, but these tests only run once per day. We didn't see this before because the jsreftest run was not completing prior to the landing of bug 582910, so this is the first run where it was observed.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Maybe, this is http://support.microsoft.com/kb/972497
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Assignee: general → m_kato
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 465572 [details] [diff] [review] fix Use emulation instead of on Win64 due to fmod bug
Attachment #465572 -
Flags: review?(jorendorff)
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 465572 [details] [diff] [review] fix I endorse the approach, but Jim might have an opinion on the best way of saying "...or we're on Windows x64". Thanks to dbaron for noticing and filing this.
Attachment #465572 -
Flags: review?(jorendorff) → review?(jim)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4) > I endorse the approach, but Jim might have an opinion on the best way of saying > "...or we're on Windows x64". I suspect this would result in adding only MSVC-on-x86_64 to that case, but if that's the intent, it might be good to clarify it by checking for _MSC_VER as well. If it's not the intent, you probably want to check for __x86_64 and/or __x86_64__ (gcc defines both).
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Blocks: tracking_win64
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #465572 -
Flags: review?(jim)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
pass jsreftest http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox/1285768446.1285769737.23777.gz
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•12 years ago
|
Keywords: intermittent-failure
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [orange]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•