Closed Bug 595483 Opened 14 years ago Closed 14 years ago

Port duplicateTabIn introduced in bug 448546

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Tabbed Browser, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED
seamonkey2.1b1

People

(Reporter: misak.bugzilla, Assigned: philip.chee)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

bug 448546 introduces duplicateTabIn method, which will be nice to have for API compatibility.
Blocks: SMtabAPI
No longer depends on: SMtabAPI
Purely for Firefox compatibility (otherwise totally unnecessary)
Assignee: nobody → philip.chee
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #477954 - Flags: review?(neil)
Attachment #477954 - Flags: feedback?(misak.bugzilla)
Comment on attachment 477954 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1.0 add Firefox compatible duplicateTabIn() >+ aTab = aTab ? aTab : getBrowser().selectedTab; At a quick glance, you could use aTab || getBrowser().selectedTab instead. >+ var delta = aHistoryIndex == null ? currentIndex : >+ aHistoryIndex - currentIndex; Surely if aHistoryIndex is null then delta should be zero?
>>+ var delta = aHistoryIndex == null ? currentIndex : >>+ aHistoryIndex - currentIndex; > Surely if aHistoryIndex is null then delta should be zero? Yeah that's what I assumed at first too, but I couldn't match Firefox observed behaviour that way. Unfortunately I have to be compatible with their brain damaged implementation, so this silly construct.
Attachment #477954 - Flags: feedback?(misak.bugzilla) → feedback+
Attachment #477954 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #477954 - Flags: review?(neil)
>>+ aTab = aTab ? aTab : getBrowser().selectedTab; > At a quick glance, you could use aTab || getBrowser().selectedTab instead. Fixed. >>+ var delta = aHistoryIndex == null ? currentIndex : >>+ aHistoryIndex - currentIndex; > Surely if aHistoryIndex is null then delta should be zero? Sigh. Brain fade at 2am. Cut and pasted the wrong block into my active patch. Fixed.
Attachment #478223 - Flags: superreview?(neil)
Attachment #478223 - Flags: review?(neil)
Comment on attachment 478223 [details] [diff] [review] Patch 1.1 fix issues. >+/* Firefox compatibility shim * >+ * duplicateTabIn duplicates tab in a place specified by the parameter |where|. [This should have been a doc comment of course. Silly Firefox.] >+ * "tabfocused" same as "tab" but override any background preferences and >+ focus the new tab Nit: missing * on this line. >+ var currentIndex = aTab.linkedBrowser.sessionHistory.index; >+ var delta = aHistoryIndex == null ? 0 : >+ aHistoryIndex - currentIndex; Nit: fits in 80 characters without wrapping. [duplicateTabIn(null, where) would have been nice, but not required for r+]
Attachment #478223 - Flags: superreview?(neil)
Attachment #478223 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #478223 - Flags: review?(neil)
Attachment #478223 - Flags: review+
(In reply to comment #3) > >>+ var delta = aHistoryIndex == null ? currentIndex : > >>+ aHistoryIndex - currentIndex; > > Surely if aHistoryIndex is null then delta should be zero? > > Yeah that's what I assumed at first too, but I couldn't match Firefox observed > behaviour that way. Unfortunately I have to be compatible with their brain > damaged implementation, so this silly construct. But you do realize that you can file bugs on Firefox code, don't you?
>>+ * "tabfocused" same as "tab" but override any background preferences and >>+ focus the new tab > Nit: missing * on this line. Fixed. >>+ var currentIndex = aTab.linkedBrowser.sessionHistory.index; >>+ var delta = aHistoryIndex == null ? 0 : >>+ aHistoryIndex - currentIndex; > Nit: fits in 80 characters without wrapping. Fixed. > [duplicateTabIn(null, where) would have been nice, but not required for r+] Fixed using: + aTab = aTab || getBrowser().selectedTab; > Dão Gottwald 2010-09-24 08:09:24 PDT > > (In reply to comment #3) >> behaviour that way. Unfortunately I have to be compatible with their brain >> damaged implementation, so this silly construct. Oops. Apologies for this rude comment. > But you do realize that you can file bugs on Firefox code, don't you? I think I've done that before, but not recently.
Pushed to comm-central http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/ae798bbc3965 Also reapplied the patch from Bug 593683 which I accidentally clobbered. http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/4d36594ea0e8
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → seamonkey2.1b1
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Blocks: 636110
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: