Closed Bug 60377 Opened 24 years ago Closed 20 years ago

[RFE] Support IMAP STARTTLS command

Categories

(MailNews Core :: Networking: IMAP, enhancement, P3)

enhancement

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: ataylor+origacct, Assigned: Bienvenu)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug, )

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

Add support for the STARTTLS IMAP command, which allows a client to request the communication channel be changed from cleartext to SSL/TLS after a session has started. This IMAP extension is documented in RFC 2595, available here: http://www.imc.org/rfc2595. The Linux imapd included in the imap-2000 package from Redhat supports this extension.
Marking NEW so someone will look at it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Summary: Support IMAP STARTTLS command → [RFE] Support IMAP STARTTLS command
Marking fixed, we have been supporting this feature for a long time already.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
How does one enable this feature? When I connect to a STARTTLS enabled server with 1.3b, mozilla doesn't initiate the secure connection. Looking at the network traffic, I see mozilla do an IMAP CAPABILITY command. The server responds with a CAPABILITY string including the STARTTLS feature. Mozilla then procedes to do the usual login stuff. I would expect mozilla to send a STARTTLS message to the server immediately after the CAPABILITY. I also tried setting the "Use Secure Connection (SSL)" checkbox and connecting on port 143, but that results in an SSL certificate error.
Sorry, my fault. I misread this request, I was thinking about SMTP, not IMAP... Reopening, not yet fixed.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
We should also support capability LOGINDISABLED. It tells that the server won't accept plain-text LOGIN and requires STARTTLS.
OS: Linux → All
cavin was just asking me about this today. we do have imap over ssl, but not starttls support. (we do have it for smtp) you'll want to take a look at nsImapProtocol::SetupWithUrl() (and http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/mailnews/compose/src/nsSmtpProtocol.cpp) for the places to start looking. helpwante, but re-assign to cavin. (better to rot on his list, than mscott.)
Assignee: mscott → cavin
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Keywords: helpwanted
Well, i've noticed a worrying trend in corporate firewalls - port 993 has become a "forbidden" port in ultra-paranoid firewall setups (since most security people these days subscribe to the "we'd rather not have encrypted traffic leave our firewall" or the "let them use STARTTLS, Exchange supports it" schools of thought). Any chance this bug may get bumped to a slightly higher priority? Assigned to someone on Thunderbird who is willing to merge ESMTP and IMAP support? (I can't delve into the code that deep yet)
taking - shouldn't be that hard (famous last words :-) )
Assignee: cavin → bienvenu
Oh, so bug 218902 is a dupe in case of IMAP. Should we change that bug to POP only?
yes, done.
I posted a patch v2 in bug 218902. Because the relevant UI of POP is the same as for IMAP, anyone interested in this bug should have a look at that proposal.
Christian - the pop3 patch looks good to me. Just to add a few more spanners in the works though... It looks like you still don't support STARTTLS moving to SSL, only STARTTLS moving to TLS, though I may well have that wrong if the TLS code negotiatiates whatever's required to support either/both. I note that Mulberry offers the two as different options, however. As noted, the imapd from Redhat supports this, and it's the University of Washington imapd; the UW popd supports this too, and these may well be the most common imap/pop daemons out there on the 'net :-) I wish I was a better programmer to have a go at this, but I get lost with SSL etc just in the documentation; I just know I want my servers to run SSL/TLS and my client software to support it too. Anyway, thanks for all your good work, guys!
The already available SSL supports SSL and TLS and so does STARTTLS. SMTP's STARTTLS also supports both.
*** Bug 239057 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
What's the status of this issue? It's been new, a patch for pop3 is available, but no work since Feb.
Product: MailNews → Core
Any chance to see further work on this bug? Just asking, because I do have servers that only support imap with tsl and not imaps.
I was just planing to force office move to moz based IMAP client. Now it looks, I will need some other (propertary) e-mail app. Any chances to get fixed this bug? Is somebody workin on it?
(In reply to comment #17) > I was just planing to force office move to moz based IMAP client. Now it looks, > I will need some other (propertary) e-mail app. Do you really need STARTTLS? Though we should definitely support it, most servers use IMAP over SSL/TLS on a special port (mostly 993).
(In reply to comment #18) > Do you really need STARTTLS? Though we should definitely support it, most > servers use IMAP over SSL/TLS on a special port (mostly 993). I'm not sure which "most" you mean, but UW-IMAPD, Cyrus, Courier, Dovecot, Oracle Collaboration Suite and Exchange all support STARTTLS, and I'd be happier if I didn't need the extra firewall hole.
yes, this isn't hard to do.
(In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > I was just planing to force office move to moz based IMAP client. Now it looks, > > I will need some other (propertary) e-mail app. > > Do you really need STARTTLS? Though we should definitely support it, most > servers use IMAP over SSL/TLS on a special port (mostly 993). (1) STARTTLS is the method specified in the IMAP spec set (RFC 2595 to be specific) for support of SSL/TLS. There is no official standing for the separate-port approach. Most people do it because they're operating by analogy with https, but it's a non-standard hack. Seems to me Mozilla talks a lot about promoting standards. Being realistic by supporting the separate-port hack is fine, but not being standards-compliant (especially when it's easy and your users are asking for it and servers all support it) is just not right. (2) The real point is that to use the separate-port hack, the user has to go into bizarre setup land and configure their client to use it. The real win of STARTTLS is that the client can have a default policy of "use TLS if server offers it", and *it will just work* without the user having to do anything. The way it is now, sites who want their clients to just work without having them configure stuff *can't use SSL/TLS* and probably run with password-in-the-clear for this reason. This is sad and completely avoidable.
We do need this fixed. Many hosting providers running IMAP servers already support STARTTLS (like Courier and Exchange). So the admins of those sites are less likely to graft on SSL (via stunnel?) support.
(In reply to comment #21) > (1) STARTTLS is the method specified in the IMAP spec set (RFC 2595 to be > specific) for support of SSL/TLS. There is no official standing for the > separate-port approach. Most people do it because they're operating by analogy > with https, but it's a non-standard hack. Seems to me Mozilla talks a lot about > promoting standards. Well, I know that and fully agree. See my comment #11, if I would know the IMAP code I've already done it. But telling David that maybe has some effect. :)
(In reply to comment #20) > yes, this isn't hard to do. I know a guy who wrote the following some comments above: > taking - shouldn't be that hard (famous last words :-) )
Attached patch proposed fix (obsolete) — Splinter Review
STARTTLS for IMAP, used by default if server supports STARTTLS, and user hasn't turned useTLS pref off
Attachment #171919 - Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Comment on attachment 171919 [details] [diff] [review] proposed fix 1) bump the IID in nsIMsgIncomingServer 2) will adding mail.server.default.useTLS have any negative effect on non imap servers?
Attachment #171919 - Flags: superreview?(mscott) → superreview+
thx, I'll bump the IID. mail.server.default.useTLS won't affect other servers, yet. When we do starttls for pop3, I would expect that pref to be able to turn it off.
(In reply to comment #27) > thx, I'll bump the IID. > > mail.server.default.useTLS won't affect other servers, yet. When we do > starttls for pop3, I would expect that pref to be able to turn it off. In my patch for bug 218902 (POP3 case) I introduced mail.server.default.useSSL resp. useSSL with type int. That to get rid of isSecure and being able of holding all four states in one pref as we it for SMTP. I waited over one year with that POP3 patch to synchronize the changes (e.g. ns(I)MsgIncomingServer) with the IMAP case. The UI part could also be shared. So it would be nice if we could talk about that before your checkin.
I'm all for sharing...however, imap is a little different (simpler). The server tells us if it supports STARTTLS so we don't have to guess...And, the always use TLS, even when not available, doesn't make sense to me in the imap context. And finally, if you want me to be able to use the settings for that pref, they can't be in the pop3 protocol code, but need to be more general, like in nsIMsgIncomingServer.idl. My thinking was that IMAP would always use TLS, if available, and maybe we'd have a pref UI to turn it off, maybe in advanced settings. But we can try to merge the approaches somehow...
(In reply to comment #29) > I'm all for sharing...however, imap is a little different (simpler). The > server tells us if it supports STARTTLS so we don't have to guess...And, the > always use TLS, even when not available, doesn't make sense to me in the imap > context. The POP code doesn't has to guess too since STLS in CAPA tells the client if STARTTLS is available. To me "always use TLS" makes sense. If the user only wants to communicate over encrypted and authenticated link we should obey him. Working on the SMTP over SSL patch I read the following argumentation a few times: What happens if an attacker hijacks the connection to the server? "TLS if available" would just use a normal link when the attacker doesn't offer STARTTLS on his machine while the always option would fail. And it would also fail if the offerst TLS because of the wrong certificate. > And finally, if you want me to be able to use the settings for that pref, > they can't be in the pop3 protocol code, but need to be more general, like in > nsIMsgIncomingServer.idl. Sure - look at my patch, I used ns(I)MsgIncomingServer. > My thinking was that IMAP would always use TLS, if available, and maybe we'd > have a pref UI to turn it off, maybe in advanced settings. But we can try to > merge the approaches somehow... And the current behaviour of using a different port and POP/IMAP over SSL? Having two options/prefs (isSecure and useTLS) will be confusing. From your patch it looks ssl will be used if activated even if useTLS is too - I don't think that's ok. The UI in my POP patch could also be used for IMAP and is the same as for SMTP, so it would be consistent.
I understand your points about why all 4 settings are useful in some scenarios, but I'm not convinced they're useful enough to clutter up the UI. But that's relatively orthogonal since I can do the backend without worrying about the front end (i.e., respect the prefs, independent of the UI for setting them) My point about nsIMsgIncomingServer.idl is that the enum is not defined there. You have this: + /* should we use a secure channel? */ + attribute long useSSL; + but no indication of what the four values for useSSL are. That is defined in nsPop3Protocol.h : +typedef enum _UseSSL { + PREF_SECURE_NEVER = 0, + PREF_SECURE_TRY_STLS = 1, + PREF_SECURE_ALWAYS_STLS = 2, + PREF_SECURE_ALWAYS_POP3S = 3 +} UseSSL; + where I can't get at them. What I meant was the enum values need to be in nsIMsgIncomingServer.idl. I don't want to duplicate them in the imap code. So I'm going to add an enum for the socketType to my changes to nsIMsgIncomingServer.idl, and switch over to that in the imap code. I think the name useSSL is not sufficiently descriptive - I think socketType is better, and matches what necko calls the arg passed to CreateTransport. The alternative is connectionType, but I think socketType is OK. Thoughts?
(In reply to comment #31) > but no indication of what the four values for useSSL are. That is defined in > nsPop3Protocol.h Ah, now I got it. You're right. > I think the name useSSL is not sufficiently descriptive - I think socketType > is better, and matches what necko calls the arg passed to CreateTransport. That's fine for me too.
hmm, if we use one pref, useTLS, or socketType, to subsume isSecure, then we've got to worry about forwards and backwards compatibility. I.e., we need to read the old value of isSecure and set socketType accordingly, but we only want to do once. Then we'd need to convert all the callers of GetIsSecure to use socketType, or change the impl of GetIsSecure to check the socketType value...But the biggest concern is migrating the isSecure pref to the new aggregrate pref. That's a bit of a pain because you need to add a version pref that says we've upgraded the prefs, and we need to find a place in the code to put the pref upgrading...
(In reply to comment #33) > hmm, if we use one pref, useTLS, or socketType, to subsume isSecure, then > we've got to worry about forwards and backwards compatibility. Yes, I know. I hoped we could ignore compatibility in this point. But maybe we can just ignore forwards compatibility but be backwards compatible if we keep the isSecure pref and read it in GetSocketType. If isSecure is false we can use the socketType value, is isSecure true, socketType is set to 3 AND isSecure set to false. Calls of GetIsSecure and SetIsSecure for POP and IMAP would have to be converted.
>If isSecure is false we can use the socketType value, if isSecure true, >socketType is set to 3 AND isSecure set to false. Forwards compatibility is an issue, especially for developers, but also for people who try new builds and then go back to an older build, so I don't think we can go clearing that pref in prefs.js on upgrade. We could only pay attention to isSecure if the new pref had its default value (currently TryTLS) So I'd propose the following logic: NS_IMETHODIMP nsMsgIncomingServer::GetSocketType(PRInt32 *aSocketType) { nsCAutoString fullPrefName; getPrefName(m_serverKey.get(), "socketType", fullPrefName); nsresult rv = m_prefBranch->GetIntPref(fullPrefName.get(), aSocketType); // socketType is set to default value. Look at isSecure setting if (NS_FAILED(rv)) { PRBool isSecure; rv = getBoolPref("isSecure", &isSecure); if (NS_SUCCEEDED(rv) && isSecure) { *aSocketType = nsIMsgIncomingServer::useSSL; SetSocketType(*aSocketType); } else { getDefaultIntPref("socketType", aSocketType); } } return rv; } After this code runs, if isSecure was true, that pref will effectively be ignored going forward and we'll use the socket type pref. If it was false, we'll use the socketType value going forward. This is all less than ideal because if the socketType is set to the default, we'll still try to read the isSecure pref, though it won't have any effect unless it has been changed to true. There are a couple alternatives - adding a socket version upgrade pref, which we would have to check every time, and would be written to prefs.js, and having a default value for socketType that wasn't valid, so we'd detect the invalid value and upgrade to a valid value. That's a bit ugly, because the account settings code would also have to worry about that, and we'd end up always writing out a value for the pref. So I think my proposal might be the least bad, though I'm not crazy about it and open to suggestions that don't break old profiles.
Keywords: helpwanted
(In reply to comment #30) > What happens if an attacker hijacks the connection to the server? "TLS if > available" would just use a normal link when the attacker doesn't offer STARTTLS > on his machine while the always option would fail. And it would also fail if the > offerst TLS because of the wrong certificate. Well, just my 2c here, but I'd quite like to see this option (and perhaps others around POP3 and SMTP) work on a configuration-time or first-time basis, not vary their behaviour per connection; that is to say, if I pick "TLS if available" and it works first time, then the stored setting ought to end up being "TLS always" or at least I ought to get a warning if TLS suddenly stops working. Also, as already noted, I ought to get a warning if the certificate was the wrong one or had changed (the same as any decent SSH client). As I'm not much of a coder (not C/C++/Java on a megaproject like this, anyway), this is probably something I shouldn't be asking for here, but thank you all for your good work!
this expands on the old patch, adopting Christian's comments about using one pref, socketType.
Attachment #171919 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #172054 - Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Attachment #172054 - Flags: superreview?(mscott) → superreview+
(In reply to comment #37) > Created an attachment (id=172054) [edit] > fix incorporating Christian's comments That handling in GetSocketType() is good. What about also adjust SetSocketType() so isSecure is set according to socketType? E.g. if (aSocketType == useSSL) SetIntValue("isSecure", true); if (aSocketType == defaultSocket) SetIntValue("isSecure", false); Switching between builds back and forth is nice but while being careful in changing interfaces and prefs we shouldn't overrate compatibility forever. Relevance of isSecure pref will decrease with every future version.
wouldn't it just be: SetBoolValue("isSecure", aSocketType == useSSL); But this would seem to prolong the relevancy of "isSecure", which undermines your point a little :-) I'm mostly concerned about upgrading and not diddling the older build's pref under normal situations. I don't mind if the prefs eventually diverge, if that makes sense. But that reminds me - the account settings UI code doesn't call GetSocketType, does it? It looks at the pref directly. So either you need to add a call to GetSocketType in there so the socketType pref gets automatically upgraded, before the account settings code loads the pref, or you need to duplicate that logic. I think just adding a call to GetSocketType with a comment about why would be the easiest thing to do.
(In reply to comment #39) > SetBoolValue("isSecure", aSocketType == useSSL); Hmpf, of course. > But this would seem to prolong the relevancy of "isSecure", which undermines > your point a little :-) As I wrote being careful is good, so do what's possible but only without extraordinary costs. > But that reminds me - the account settings UI code doesn't call GetSocketType, > does it? It looks at the pref directly. So either you need to add a call to > GetSocketType in there so the socketType pref gets automatically upgraded, > before the account settings code loads the pref, or you need to duplicate that > logic. The patch needs to be overhauled anyway, I'll take care of that.
fixed on trunk. Thinking about it again, I think you were right: if (aSocketType == useSSL) SetBoolValue("isSecure", true); if (aSocketType == defaultSocket) SetBoolValue("isSecure", false); the other choices might end up turning off SSL in the older builds if the user decided they wanted TLS in the newer build...but I haven't checked in anything yet to do with setting isSecure.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Though I don't fully understand the IMAP code and can't test with a STARTTLS able server, I doubt this is fixed. I can't find a place in the IMAP code where the command "STARTTLS" is issued or connection is switched from unencrypted to encrypted. And I also think && (capability & kHasStartTLSCapability) on nsImapProtocol.cpp#765 is wrong since at the time the transport is created, kHasStartTLSCapability can't already be set (resp. if capability infos are cached it can't be set at least for the first connection in a session).
UI controls would be nice, too, once your at it.
(In reply to comment #43) > UI controls would be nice, too, once your at it. The UI is shared between POP3 and IMAP and included in patch of bug 218902. Please let me know there what you think.
you could be right, but, + connectionType = "starttls"; and connectionType is passed to CreateTransport. You're right that the very first time you connect to an imap server, we can't know the capabilities so we won't use TLS if you say to use it when available, but since we write the capabilities to prefs.js, we should TLS every time after that, even with the first connection after restart... I don't know what we have to do to set the connection as encrypted. I thought necko did that...
you're right about sending the command STARTTLS, I misread that comment - reopening...
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
(In reply to comment #45) This comment might be unnecessary after reopening, but since I put all the work in it, I'll post it nevertheless. :) > but since we write the capabilities to prefs.js, we should TLS every time > after that, even with the first connection after restart... Ah ok, POP doesn't cache CAPA informations. But given the following I still think the line cited is unnecessary. > I don't know what we have to do to set the connection as encrypted. I thought > necko did that... I only know what SMTP does. But since it also (indirectly) passes "starttls" to CreateTransport() but doesn't connect encrypted I think as follows: 1. if types is nsnull, no encryption is used and can't be enabled afterwards. 2. if type is "ssl", encryption is used right from the start 3. if types is "starttls", no encryption is used but can switched afterwards. SMTP code and my POP patch do this by calling sslControl->StartTLS(), see nsSmtpProtocol::SendTLSResponse(). From RFC 2595 chapter 3, it's clear the client has to tell the server the wish to start TLS while in unencrypted state and switches after positive response.
I noted another problem. When setting socketType using SetSocketType(), it will clear the pref if the value is the default value (in SetIntValue()). If isSecure is set, socketType will be returned as useSSL when GetSocketType() is called next time. I.e. the value the user sets isn't always the value used! One workarounds would be adding SetBoolValue("isSecure", aSocketType == useSSL); in SetSocketType(). This has two drawbacks: the one you noted in comment #41 and it won't work if we use the UI Roland proposed in bug 218902 comment #19. It would use isSecure for the checkbox and socketType for the radios. Please let's talk about that before continuing with the backend.
I think the imap backend work can continue, since the imap backend is mostly orthogonal, unless you think the current GetSocketType call is unworkable. All the imap backend has to do is respect the GetSocketType return value correctly. What prefs implement that return value is orthogonal. I think your suggestion of this code avoids the problem I mentioned in #c41 and the one you mention in #c48 : if (aSocketType == useSSL) SetBoolValue("isSecure", true); if (aSocketType == defaultSocket) SetBoolValue("isSecure", false); Re the UI approach, I'm OK with keeping the isSecure pref - in other words, I think we should pick the best UI for the user, and make that determine what pref(s) we set.
(In reply to comment #49) > I think the imap backend work can continue, since the imap backend is mostly > orthogonal, unless you think the current GetSocketType call is unworkable. > All the imap backend has to do is respect the GetSocketType return value > correctly. I meant the code in GetSocketType() and it's usage in SetupWithUrl(). My plan is doing the following (shortened): PRBool isSecure = PR_FALSE; m_socketType = nsIMsgIncomingServer::defaultSocket; server->GetIsSecure(&m_isSecure); if (isSecure) server->GetSocketType(&m_socketType); That way we'd only respect socketType if is secure connection is switched on in general. > Re the UI approach, I'm OK with keeping the isSecure pref - in other words, I > think we should pick the best UI for the user, and make that determine what > pref(s) we set. If we're going to use isSecure in the UI in order to switch on/off any encryption (serverTypeElement.disabled == !isSecure) it's wrong manipulating isSecure in any other place. So the code mentioned in #c41 and #c48 would be wrong. SetSocketType() shouldn't use SetIntValue() but directly write the pref without clearing it if the value to write is the default.
That doesn't seem consistent. Use TLS if available, for example, is not secure, if TLS is not available.
this should get TLS working, and implements LOGINDISABLED, which is required if you implement STARTTLS. Re isSecure, it really needs to be orthogonal to the sockettype, since we use isSecure for the port number, among other things!
(In reply to comment #51) > That doesn't seem consistent. Use TLS if available, for example, is not secure, > if TLS is not available. What means the UI Roland proposed isn't useable. > Re isSecure, it really needs to be orthogonal to the sockettype, since we use > isSecure for the port number, among other things! What means if (aSocketType == useSSL) SetBoolValue("isSecure", true); if (aSocketType == defaultSocket) SetBoolValue("isSecure", false); in SetSocketType() is necessary AND it shouldn't use SetIntValue() in any case.
>What means the UI Roland proposed isn't useable. Yes, I think it's just wrong...we'd have to remove the "use tls if available" option to make that workable, and since I think that should be the default option, I don't think we should remove it :-) yes, I think this code is fine: if (aSocketType == useSSL) SetBoolValue("isSecure", true); if (aSocketType == defaultSocket) SetBoolValue("isSecure", false);
Comment on attachment 172757 [details] [diff] [review] fix TLS and implement LOGINDISABLED please ignore the timeout part, which comes from another patch... I'm going to turn off tls by default for now, since there are issues with security dialogs popping up because some isps send certs that don't match the host name or something like that...
Attachment #172757 - Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Attachment #172757 - Flags: superreview?(mscott) → superreview+
fix checked in - and as I said earlier, I also changed the default to non-secure because TLS by default will have issues. We might want to add TLS to the new account UI so the user can turn on TLS when defining an account.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
(In reply to comment #56) > We might want to add TLS to the new account UI so the user > can turn on TLS when defining an account. Good idea, that's bug 80919, fyi.
Comment on attachment 172054 [details] [diff] [review] fix incorporating Christian's comments >+ // socketType is set to default value. Look at isSecure setting >+ if (NS_FAILED(rv)) >+ { >+ PRBool isSecure; >+ rv = GetBoolValue("isSecure", &isSecure); >+ if (NS_SUCCEEDED(rv) && isSecure) >+ { >+ *aSocketType = nsIMsgIncomingServer::useSSL; >+ SetSocketType(*aSocketType); >+ } >+ else >+ { >+ getDefaultIntPref("socketType", aSocketType); >+ } This doesn't do what you expect, because GetBoolValue never fails.
(In reply to comment #55) > (From update of attachment 172757 [details] [diff] [review] [edit]) > please ignore the timeout part, which comes from another patch... > > I'm going to turn off tls by default for now, since there are issues with > security dialogs popping up because some isps send certs that don't match the > host name or something like that... I humbly submit that this default is profoundly mistaken and unfortunately completely undercuts all the fine work on implementing this feature. The whole point of STARTTLS is that client and server can negotiate, on the existing service port, to obtain the required level of security. If the client by default *refuses* to do STARTTLS even when offered by the server then we are back to forcing the user to get involved in this negotiation by clicking on mysterious security options. The design of STARTTLS (with capability advertising) permits a site like ours that actually wants to protect our users' passwords (ie, any rational site) to require TLS, and have it work with clients that can negotiate it, while still permitting these same clients, with the same default setting, to work just fine on other sites that don't care to use TLS. Your reasoning about avoiding security popups just doesn't make sense. If we have misconfigured TLS on our site so users see popups, then the users *will see them anyway*, after they have been forced to check the mysterious security settings. You haven't protected them from anything, in fact just the reverse. The sites you are catering to with this default are those that permit clear connections, but have TLS turned on and misconfigured. Do these brain-damaged sites really deserve to control the default and make life miserable for well-run sites? So please please please make "TLS, if available" the default setting. Please. I'd reopen this bug if I could but I can't.
the problem is that the security dialog hangs the app sometimes. Until that's fixed, I really don't want to turn this on by default.
(In reply to comment #60) > the problem is that the security dialog hangs the app sometimes. Until that's > fixed, I really don't want to turn this on by default. OK, is there a bug to track on that? If this happens often enough to affect this default, it seems like it would be a showstopper for providing any TLS support (and if it doesn't happen that often, then it shouldn't affect this default).
Blocks: 270483
Product: Core → MailNews Core
See Also: → 661510
See Also: → 115349
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: