Closed
Bug 607316
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Run set toolsdir only once
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P4)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: armenzg, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [simple])
Attachments
(1 file)
5.43 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We run this command twice for Windows jobs and we override in every class subclassing MozillaBuildFactory.
The attached patch fixes the step in MozillaBuildFactory so there is no need to override the step in all subclassing factories.
This also fixes the scenario for Win64.
Attachment #486062 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → armenzg
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
OS: Mac OS X → Windows Server 2003
Priority: -- → P2
Hardware: x86 → All
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 486062 [details] [diff] [review]
call set toolsdir only once
I don't think self.platform exists at this point...have you tested this?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 486062 [details] [diff] [review]
call set toolsdir only once
Let me make sure that the patch works.
The checkconfigs I run where working but on staging is not taking it as is.
More to come.
Attachment #486062 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
I have put up a patch to fix the Win64 issue in bug 565402. Sorry if my testing scripts on my local machine made me think I had a good patch for review.
Would you be fine WONTFIXing this bug even if it is valid? (meaning that we should not spend time trying to fix and test this small bug)
Assignee: armenzg → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Priority: P2 → P4
Whiteboard: [simple]
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> Would you be fine WONTFIXing this bug even if it is valid? (meaning that we
> should not spend time trying to fix and test this small bug)
Let's not punt on everything. This is the kind of bug that's perfect for new hires.
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Would you be fine WONTFIXing this bug even if it is valid? (meaning that we
> > should not spend time trying to fix and test this small bug)
>
> Let's not punt on everything. This is the kind of bug that's perfect for new
> hires.
Agreed, and I don't think we should WONTFIX. It's just low priority.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•