Closed
Bug 609905
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
reTempAlloc: 512k heap allocation for no purpose
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Core
JavaScript Engine
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
blocking2.0 | --- | betaN+ |
People
(Reporter: jseward, Assigned: jseward)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: fixed-in-tracemonkey)
Attachments
(1 file)
3.83 KB,
patch
|
n.nethercote
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
jstracer.cpp, InitJIT():
7807: tm->reTempAlloc = new VMAllocator();
allocates 512kb of memory at process start, but is never used. AFAICS
reTempAlloc is redundant (nothing is ever allocated in it) and can be
done away with. I guess it got left over from the old regexp engine.
The block stayed alive for 15.02 billion insns, almost the entire life
of the program (15.08 billion -- start browser and surf a bit).
Only 192 bytes of the block were read, and 825 written -- admin
stuff I suspect.
-------------------- 32 of 5000 --------------------
max-live: 524,328 in 1 blocks
tot-alloc: 524,328 in 1 blocks (avg size 524328.00)
deaths: 1, at avg age 15,015,989,851
acc-ratios: 0.00 rd, 0.00 wr (192 b-read, 825 b-written)
at 0x4C27ECA: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:261)
by 0x661D01D: js::InitJIT(js::TraceMonitor*) (jstracer.cpp:7807)
by 0x651FBEB: JSThreadData::init() (jscntxt.cpp:497)
by 0x652049D: js_CurrentThread(JSRuntime*) (jscntxt.cpp:588)
by 0x652085C: js_InitContextThread(JSContext*) (jscntxt.cpp:659)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #488593 -
Flags: review?(nnethercote)
![]() |
||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 488593 [details] [diff] [review]
remove reTempAlloc
Nice find!
Attachment #488593 -
Flags: review?(nnethercote) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
![]() |
||
Updated•15 years ago
|
blocking2.0: --- → beta9+
![]() |
||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: fixed-in-tracemonkey
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: general → jseward
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
As per today's meeting, beta 9 will be a time-based release. Marking these all betaN+. Please move it back to beta9+ if you believe it MUST be in the next beta (ie: trunk is in an unshippable state without this)
blocking2.0: beta9+ → betaN+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•