613175 - "Secure Connection Failed" error refers to removed Help -> Report broken site command

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1014282

(Core Graveyard :: Security: UI, defect)

Description

[Alexander L. Slovesnik]

"Secure Connection Failed" error shows following text:

The page you are trying to view can not be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified.
Please contact the web site owners to inform them of this problem. Alternatively, use the command found in the help menu to report this broken site.


I think that "Alternatively, use the command found in the help menu to report this broken site" part should be removed. I guess this should block Firefox 4.0b8 because it involves l10n strings.

Comment 1

[Axel Hecht [:Pike]]

Do you have an example page where this string shows up?

I've tested https://master.support.mozilla.com/de/, and that actually shows about:certerror instead of about:neterror.

Comment 2

[Alexander L. Slovesnik]

(In reply to comment #1)
> Do you have an example page where this string shows up?
> 
Here is example: https://www.citylink.com.au/

Comment 3

[Axel Hecht [:Pike]]

Right. It doesn't help that we have "Report Web Forgery…" in the Help menu, http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/locales/en-US/chrome/browser/safebrowsing/report-phishing.dtd#1.

That sounds like a real source of confusion. Johnath?

Comment 4

[Johnathan Nightingale [:johnath]]

I agree.

Personally, I'd be happy to just see us use nssBadCert.longDesc2 ( http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/locales/en-US/chrome/overrides/netError.dtd#139 ) for all of these "miscellaneous nss errors".

Comment 5

[Brian Smith (:briansmith, :bsmith, use NEEDINFO?)]

Very few websites will cause this error to be seen. After bug 587407 is fixed this error will practically never be seen. Almost nobody will see this message after is fixed. Marking softblocker since bug 587407 was already marked softblocker.

Comment 6

[Sheila Mooney]

Sounds like we are past the string freeze. Is it realistic that this will get done? If not, can we just minus it?

Comment 7

[Mike Beltzner [:beltzner, not reading bugmail]]

Yeah, not worth taking the late string hit as per comment 5.

Comment 8

[Alexander L. Slovesnik]

Looks like it's been fixed in Bug 1014282