Closed
Bug 613921
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Create a LDAP SDKs repository: http://hg.mozilla.org/ldap-sdks/
Categories
(mozilla.org Graveyard :: Server Operations, task)
mozilla.org Graveyard
Server Operations
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: standard8, Assigned: jlaz)
References
Details
We are transitioning the LDAP SDKs from cvs to hg. Please can you create an empty repository as follows:
Location: http://hg.mozilla.org/ldap-sdks/
Description: Development repository for the LDAP SDKs
Commit Access Level: Level 3
We've chosen Level 3 as Thunderbird & SeaMonkey will be pulling this directly into what they build, so Level 3 fits most appropriately.
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Mark,
Does this have to be a top-level repo? Can't it live elsewhere within hg?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Does this have to be a top-level repo? Can't it live elsewhere within hg?
After chatting on irc, it seems that http://hg.mozilla.org/projects/ldap-sdks/ would be the slightly better place.
Give me a day to confirm that this is ok with the interested parties.
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
http://hg.mozilla.org/projects/ seems to host (mostly) temporary "branches", doesn't it?
I don't know what is worse with having ldap-sdks/ as a top level repo., but given the current "Repository Layout", that's where I would expect it to live.
That said, maybe I'm just missing some explanation.
Anyway, I'll be happy when it's in Hg, wherever that will be ;->
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
>
> http://hg.mozilla.org/projects/ seems to host (mostly) temporary "branches",
> doesn't it?
I don't think it hurts to extend that definition.
> I don't know what is worse with having ldap-sdks/ as a top level repo., but
> given the current "Repository Layout", that's where I would expect it to live.
It was commented over irc that only really important stuff should go at the top level. I'm not convinced that ldap-sdks falls into that definition. I suspect things like venkman/chatzilla etc would have also been moved elsewhere had the policy been in place at the time when they were created.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Created hg.mozilla.org/projects/ldap-sdks under scm_level_3
Assignee: server-ops → jlazaro
| Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> I suspect
> things like venkman/chatzilla etc would have also been moved elsewhere had the
> policy been in place at the time when they were created.
Yeah, I noticed these.
(Isn't it possible to move them now?)
***
V.Fixed: url works.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•