Closed
Bug 620724
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
feedback button not working
Categories
(Input :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: miketng, Assigned: christian)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_5; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.3 Safari/533.19.4
Build Identifier: 4.0b7
testing firefox 4beta. I would like to use the feedback button but everytime I use it, it says I need the latest firefox. I redownloaded beta twice and still the button tells me I need the latest. so how can I send feedback during this beta test?
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.click on feedback button
2.click on I am happy or sad about firefox
3.
Actual Results:
keeps going to the page stating I need the latest firefox which I already have
Expected Results:
want to send feedback on firesfox but feedback button not working atleast not yet
Surely this can't be too hard to fix.
Either the logic in the test comparison between the user's installed version and Mozilla's latest beta version is returning FALSE when it should be TRUE or the comparison string on the Version host is not the same as that on the users installation.
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
Mozilla is nearing the beta 8 release. As I understand bug 582257 is the best they can do at this time. Currently http://svn.mozilla.org/libs/product-details/firefoxDetails.class.php says that beta 8 is the current build and rejects feedback from older builds.
Component: General → Input
Product: Firefox → Webtools
QA Contact: general → input
Version: unspecified → 2.0
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
CCing Legneato: Is Beta 8 already released? If not, we shouldn't update the product details yet: It breaks Firefox Input.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 9•14 years ago
|
||
Aparently, it must be released yesterday (second http://svn.mozilla.org/libs/product-details/history/firefoxHistory.class.php).
Flags: in-testsuite+
Flags: in-litmus+
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
It's because mozilla.com does not auto-update its library data while Input does.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•14 years ago
|
||
Beta 8 is not officially live yet. Patience. I'll take this as it should be fixed when I push p-d
Assignee: nobody → clegnitto
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•14 years ago
|
||
Input shouldn't auto-update...it should always use the revision that mozilla.com checks out into /includes....
Comment 14•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #13)
> Input shouldn't auto-update...it should always use the revision that
> mozilla.com checks out into /includes....
Input is auto-updating quite intentionally, so that IT does not manually need to push changes when a new version is released. I'll ponder how we can improve this in the future.
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•14 years ago
|
||
Can you use the json feeds from mozilla.com? The data is there (http://www.mozilla.com/includes/product-details/json/firefox_versions.json and http://www.mozilla.com/includes/product-details/json/mobile_details.json) and will ensure you are always in sync with the homepage.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•14 years ago
|
||
(FWIW I plan on bring up a system that is a single source of truth for this sort of thing next quarter or so).
Comment 17•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #16)
> (FWIW I plan on bring up a system that is a single source of truth for this
> sort of thing next quarter or so).
We should discuss this. There are a handful-or-so of consumers using the django-mozilla-product-details (sic!) library. If we want to build a web service that's fed by releng's build scripts and spits out JSON on demand, I am game.
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > (FWIW I plan on bring up a system that is a single source of truth for this
> > sort of thing next quarter or so).
>
> We should discuss this. There are a handful-or-so of consumers using the
> django-mozilla-product-details (sic!) library. If we want to build a web
> service that's fed by releng's build scripts and spits out JSON on demand, I am
> game.
That's the plan. We'll take this offline. I'll be sending a meeting around about it and will be sure to include you. The planned system is actually why I started pulse...I went to build it and realized I needed events from the build system.
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•14 years ago
|
||
This should be fixed now that we are live. Closing. We can clone for potential input.mozilla.com improvements so it doesn't pull from trunk.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 23•14 years ago
|
||
I just tried to report a feedback in 4.0rc1 (by Help and Submit Feedback) and got the below:
And YES cookies ARE enabled...
CSRF Protection Error
There was an error verifying your CSRF token. Your request could not be processed. We apologize for the inconvenience!
The most likely cause of this error is that your browser is set up not to accept cookies from us. Please follow these instructions to enable cookies in Firefox, then try again.
If the problem persists, please file a bug. Thanks!
Comment 24•14 years ago
|
||
This bug is now showing itself in Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:2.0b13pre) Gecko/20110309 Firefox/4.0b13pre
Comment 25•14 years ago
|
||
Jim: That's a different bug. 4.0b13pre is a nightly, support for which is not yet implemented.
Updated•14 years ago
|
Component: Input → General
Product: Webtools → Input
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•