Last Comment Bug 621710 - Add to PSL
: Add to PSL
Product: Core
Classification: Components
Component: Networking: Domain Lists (show other bugs)
: unspecified
: All All
: -- normal (vote)
: mozilla2.0
Assigned To: Gervase Markham [:gerv]
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-12-28 09:22 PST by Gervase Markham [:gerv]
Modified: 2011-03-14 02:44 PDT (History)
1 user (show)
See Also:
Crash Signature:
QA Whiteboard:
Iteration: ---
Points: ---
Has Regression Range: ---
Has STR: ---

Patch v.1 (886 bytes, patch)
2011-01-26 12:40 PST, Gervase Markham [:gerv]
mbeltzner: approval2.0+
dveditz: approval1.9.2.17+
dveditz: approval1.9.1.19+
Details | Diff | Review

Description Gervase Markham [:gerv] 2010-12-28 09:22:50 PST
Dear Publicsuffix,

In he near future we will start giving out registrations for to dutch companies that are a registered BV (besloten vennootschap). For correct browser behaviour we would like to be included in the list. Also, can you advise on how to get this same issue solved on IE and safari?
Attached you will find our diff.

Marius Karthaus



--- tld.dat	2010-12-10 06:10:56.000000000 +0100
+++	2010-12-12 21:42:26.821109002 +0100
@@ -2647,7 +2647,8 @@
 // Confirmed by registry <> (with technical
 // reservations) 2008-06-08
+// will be a registry for dutch BV's (besloten vennootschap)
 // no :
 // The Norwegian registry has declined to notify us of updates. The web pages
 // referenced below are the official source of the data. There is also an
Comment 1 Gervase Markham [:gerv] 2011-01-18 05:11:01 PST
This diff says that we should treat <something>, as a public suffix - and therefore that the website for e.g. Foo B.V. is going to be registered at foo.<something> However, the English text of the email says that websites are going to be registered at

I have emailed the registry to ask them to clarify.

Comment 2 Marius Karthaus 2011-01-18 15:08:58 PST
Looking at the list and the examples I do not understand why I chose to submit '*' You are right to assume that we need to have plain ''

Thank you for spotting this.
Comment 3 Gervase Markham [:gerv] 2011-01-26 12:40:45 PST
Created attachment 507210 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1

As agreed.

Comment 4 Mike Beltzner [:beltzner, not reading bugmail] 2011-02-16 12:53:07 PST
Comment on attachment 507210 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1

Comment 5 David Baron :dbaron: ⌚️UTC-7 (review requests must explain patch) 2011-02-27 20:00:15 PST

(I used the wrong bug number, though; I'll comment there.)
Comment 6 Daniel Veditz [:dveditz] 2011-03-11 11:33:44 PST
Comment on attachment 507210 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1

Approved for and, a=dveditz

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.