Closed
Bug 622978
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
Crash in nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist
Categories
(Core :: Web Painting, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
blocking2.0 | --- | - |
People
(Reporter: scoobidiver, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: crash)
Crash Data
It is a residual crash signature that exists in trunk builds. It is #34 top crasher in 4.0b9pre for the last week. Signature nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsRegion*, nsRect const&) UUID a41cde21-9838-46fd-bdeb-d3b872110104 Time 2011-01-04 10:39:42.532570 Uptime 2196 Last Crash 69043 seconds (19.2 hours) before submission Install Age 82818 seconds (23.0 hours) since version was first installed. Product Firefox Version 4.0b9pre Build ID 20110103030359 Branch 2.0 OS Windows NT OS Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 CPU x86 CPU Info AuthenticAMD family 6 model 8 stepping 1 Crash Reason EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_READ Crash Address 0x47106d93 User Comments App Notes AdapterVendorID: 10de, AdapterDeviceID: 0326 Frame Module Signature [Expand] Source 0 @0x47106d93 1 xul.dll nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:368 2 xul.dll nsDisplayClip::ComputeVisibility layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:1593 3 xul.dll nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:365 4 xul.dll nsDisplayClip::ComputeVisibility layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:1593 5 xul.dll nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:365 6 xul.dll nsDisplayClip::ComputeVisibility layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:1593 7 xul.dll nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:365 8 xul.dll nsDisplayWrapList::ComputeVisibility layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:1322 9 xul.dll nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:365 10 xul.dll nsDisplayClip::ComputeVisibility layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:1593 11 xul.dll nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:365 12 xul.dll nsDisplayClip::ComputeVisibility layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:1593 13 xul.dll nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:365 14 xul.dll nsDisplayClip::ComputeVisibility layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:1593 15 xul.dll nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:365 16 xul.dll nsLayoutUtils::PaintFrame layout/base/nsLayoutUtils.cpp:1429 17 xul.dll PresShell::Paint layout/base/nsPresShell.cpp:6108 18 xul.dll nsViewManager::RenderViews view/src/nsViewManager.cpp:447 19 xul.dll nsViewManager::Refresh view/src/nsViewManager.cpp:413 20 xul.dll nsViewManager::DispatchEvent view/src/nsViewManager.cpp:912 21 xul.dll AttachedHandleEvent view/src/nsView.cpp:193 22 xul.dll nsWindow::DispatchEvent widget/src/windows/nsWindow.cpp:3658 23 xul.dll nsWindow::DispatchWindowEvent widget/src/windows/nsWindow.cpp:3686 24 xul.dll nsWindow::OnPaint 25 user32.dll RealDefWindowProcWorker 26 user32.dll HMValidateHandle 27 user32.dll RealDefWindowProcW 28 user32.dll WinStationSendMessageW 29 user32.dll DefWindowProcW 30 user32.dll DefWindowProcW 31 user32.dll UserCallWinProcCheckWow More reports at: http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?range_value=4&range_unit=weeks&signature=nsDisplayList%3A%3AComputeVisibilityForSublist%28nsDisplayListBuilder*%2C%20nsRegion*%2C%20nsRect%20const%26%29
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
blocking2.0: --- → ?
Don't want to block without steps to reproduce
blocking2.0: ? → -
Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Crash Signature: [@ nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsRegion*, nsRect const&) ]
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Crash Signature: [@ nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsRegion*, nsRect const&) ] → nsRect const&)]
[@ @0x0 | nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsRegion*, nsRect const&, nsRect const&)] [@ nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsRegion*, nsRect const&, nsRect const&)]
[@ _pure…
Summary: crash [@ nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsRegion*, nsRect const&) ] → Crash in nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
This signature is on the rise, now at #42 in FF 22.0a2 topcrash list. Combined signatures are at ~2000 incidents in the past 4 weeks for FF/all versions.
Crash Signature: , nsRect const&)]
[@ @0x0 | nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsRegion*, nsRect const&, nsRect const&)] → , nsRect const&)]
[@ @0x0 | nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsRegion*, nsRect const&, nsRect const&)]
[@ nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsDisplayItem*, nsRegion*, nsRect const&, nsRect…
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mats Palmgren [:mats] from comment #2) > This signature is on the rise, now at #42 in FF 22.0a2 topcrash list. It's not enough to qualify it for the topcrash keyword (see https://wiki.mozilla.org/CrashKill/Topcrash). In addition, it's above #90 crasher in any channels.
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
That's not a very useful definition of topcrash. The top 20 crashes are almost always useless EMPTY, GC, CC, JIT, wrapping stuff, moz_abort etc. IOW, generic crashes that almost always have a root cause in some other code. I think it would be more useful for developers if "topcrash" means "a worrying crash high in the rankings that a developer really should try to investigate soon". With the current definition I'm more inclined to *ignore* crashes that are marked topcrash, which is unfortunate.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
A worrying crash can be tracked in the version it appeared using tracking flags without being flagged as topcrash.
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
It's much harder to query tracking flags and they are a moving target. Ideally, I think topcrash bugs should be the 1-2% of crash bugs that deserves extra attention and effort from developers and/or QA.
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mats Palmgren [:mats] from comment #4) > That's not a very useful definition of topcrash. Please discuss that definition in the stability@m.o list and not in bugs. That said, for now, the definition stands as it is, but it has some loopholes for things that are deemed to be "interesting" in solving problems larger than their pure volume, as you can see in the wiki page. Still, please take anything that isn't specific on this one crash up to the list and not the bug report.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Crash Signature: , nsRect const&)]
[@ @0x0 | nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsDisplayItem*, nsRegion*, nsRect const&, nsRect const&)] → , nsRect const&)]
[@ @0x0 | nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsDisplayItem*, nsRegion*, nsRect const&, nsRect const&)]
[@ nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSublist]
[@ _purecall | nsDisplayList::ComputeVisibilityForSub…
Updated•8 years ago
|
Component: Layout → Layout: Web Painting
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: critical → S2
Comment 8•2 years ago
|
||
Only 1 crash on crash stats from 78, this code no longer exists.
Severity: S2 → S3
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•