Closed
Bug 627910
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Update Release Notes for Bugzilla 4.0rc2
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Documentation, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 4.0
People
(Reporter: mkanat, Assigned: mkanat)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
2.95 KB,
patch
|
reed
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Flags: blocking4.0+
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 506003 [details] [diff] [review]
v1
>+ <li>[% terms.Bugzilla %] now sends the header
>+ <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en/the_x-frame-options_response_header"><code>X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN</code></a>
>+ with every page request, to prevent "clickjacking" attacks. Note that
>+ this prevents other domains from putting [% terms.Bugzilla %]
>+ in an HTML frame.</li>
How about (ignoring TT/html stuff, just text):
Bugzilla now sends the X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN header with every page request in order to prevent "clickjacking" attacks.
>+<p>If your [% terms.Bugzilla %] runs under the Apache mod_perl,
>+ the required Apache configuration is now simpler. The line that used
>+ to look like:</p>
"the Apache mod_perl" sounds weird. Drop the "the", maybe?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Thanks! Fixed both those points.
Attachment #506003 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #506037 -
Flags: review?
Attachment #506003 -
Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #506037 -
Flags: review? → review?(reed)
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 506037 [details] [diff] [review]
v2
>+ <li>[% terms.Bugzilla %] now sends the
>+ <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en/the_x-frame-options_response_header"><code>X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN</code></a> header
>+ with every page request in order to prevent "clickjacking" attacks. Note
>+ that this prevents other domains from putting [% terms.Bugzilla %]
>+ in an HTML frame.</li>
> </ul>
Maybe "displaying" rather than "putting" here? Don't care, though.
r=reed
Attachment #506037 -
Flags: review?(reed) → review+
![]() |
||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 506037 [details] [diff] [review]
v2
> [% INCLUDE req_table reqs = OPTIONAL_MODULES
>- new = ['JSON-XS']
>- updated = []
>+ new = ['JSON-XS', 'Win32-API']
>+ updated = ['Apache-SizeLimit', 'SOAP-Lite']
> include_feature = 1 %]
Math::Random::Secure is not marked as a new module.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
Ah, yeah, I agree that "displaying" is better. You are a really good copyeditor, reed. :-)
I also added MRS to the relnotes, thanks for catching that.
Committing to: bzr+ssh://bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/trunk/
modified template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl
Committed revision 7666.
Committing to: bzr+ssh://bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/4.0/
modified template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl
Committed revision 7522.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•