Closed
Bug 629611
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
add font cache size to about:support
Categories
(Core :: Graphics, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jtd, Assigned: jtd)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files, 1 obsolete file)
2.44 KB,
patch
|
bas.schouten
:
review+
joe
:
review+
joe
:
approval2.0+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
866 bytes,
patch
|
joe
:
review+
joe
:
approval2.0+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
775 bytes,
patch
|
jfkthame
:
review+
joe
:
approval2.0+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Along with the version of DirectWrite, the size of the font cache on a machine is an important cause of bug 602792, so it would be very useful to have this info when diagnosing startup problems on a given users machine.
This patch just adds it to the DirectWrite version field.
Attachment #507795 -
Flags: review?(bas.schouten)
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 507795 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, add font cache size to about:support
Looks fine to me. But it involves strings in some way, asking joe if he agrees.
Attachment #507795 -
Flags: review?(joe)
Attachment #507795 -
Flags: review?(bas.schouten)
Attachment #507795 -
Flags: review+
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 507795 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, add font cache size to about:support
this doesn't require any strings, so it's fine
I'm not overjoyed about any hardcoded, untranslateable strings in our source code; I'd rather we just appended the number itself. But I don't feel strongly about that.
Attachment #507795 -
Flags: review?(joe) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 507795 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, add font cache size to about:support
Simple, low-impact change needed for debugging user problems with cold startup.
Right, hard-coded strings aren't so hot but it's a simple way to get debug info needed into the page. My guess is that MS ships a fix for this problem so that we can simply omit this info in Firefox 4.next.
Attachment #507795 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #507795 -
Flags: approval2.0? → approval2.0+
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Landed on trunk
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c4bbf11d4c54
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
This check-in apparently broke my local build on Windows XP, that I'm doing
using one of the supported configurations. Backing the commit out locally
resolved the problem. I built with a clean objdir. Here is the information
I gathered, let me know if you need any other piece of information.
gfxWindowsPlatform.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __imp__PathAppendW@8 referenced in function "public: static void __cdecl gfxWindowsPlatform::GetFontCacheSize(class nsAString_internal &)" (?GetFontCacheSize@gfxWindowsPlatform@@SAXAAVnsAString_internal@@@Z)
gfxWindowsPlatform.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __imp__SHGetFolderPathW@20 referenced in function "public: static void __cdecl gfxWindowsPlatform::GetFontCacheSize(class nsAString_internal &)" (?GetFontCacheSize@gfxWindowsPlatform@@SAXAAVnsAString_internal@@@Z)
Build environment:
Windows XP
Visual C++ 2008 Express
Windows 7 SDK
Windows Server 2003 R2 Platform SDK
MozillaBuild 1.5
.mozconfig options:
--enable-debug
--disable-optimize
--disable-static
--disable-libxul
--disable-ipc
--enable-chrome-format=jar
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
Paolo, please file a new bug about the libxul build being broken.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago → 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•14 years ago
|
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 507795 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, add font cache size to about:support
>+ file = FindFirstFileW(path, &findFileData);
You leak this file search handle because you forgot to FindClose it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
Attachment #509639 -
Flags: review?(joe)
Attachment #509639 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Comment 9•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 509639 [details] [diff] [review]
follow-up patch, fix leak and compiler warnings
Can you use sizeof(size) instead of the literal 256 there?
Attachment #509639 -
Flags: review?(joe)
Attachment #509639 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #509639 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Attachment #509639 -
Flags: approval2.0+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
Landed follow-up patch on trunk
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/26d3a5196a5e
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
Joe Drew asked that I use sizeof() instead of an arbitrary constant but, argh, it turns out swprintf_s actually takes a *count* value rather than a size in number of bytes, so sizeof(size) isn't correct.
Attachment #512104 -
Flags: review?(bas.schouten)
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #512104 -
Flags: review?(bas.schouten) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #512104 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Comment 12•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 512104 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, fix screwup
(excuse the drive-by comment....)
Isn't this what NS_ARRAY_LENGTH(size) is for?
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•14 years ago
|
||
Attachment #512104 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #512107 -
Flags: review?(jfkthame)
Attachment #512107 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Attachment #512104 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Comment 14•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 512107 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, fix screwup v2
Looks good to me.
Attachment #512107 -
Flags: review?(jfkthame) → review+
Comment 15•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 512107 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, fix screwup v2
ffffuuuuu review fail
Attachment #512107 -
Flags: approval2.0? → approval2.0+
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•14 years ago
|
||
Landed fix screwup patch
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626611
Comment 17•14 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b12pre) Gecko/20110214 Firefox/4.0b12pre ID:20110214030347
My about:support say "font cache n/a", is this correct behavior?
Graphics
Adapter Description: ATI Radeon HD 4300/4500 Series
Vendor ID: 1002
Device ID: 954f
Adapter RAM: 512
Adapter Drivers: aticfx64 aticfx64 aticfx32 aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64
Driver Version: 8.812.0.0
Driver Date: 1-4-2011
Direct2D Enabled: true
DirectWrite Enabled: true (6.1.7600.20830, font cache n/a)
WebGL Renderer: Google Inc. -- ANGLE -- OpenGL ES 2.0 (ANGLE 0.0.0.541)
GPU Accelerated Windows: 1/1 Direct3D 10
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #17)
> My about:support say "font cache n/a", is this correct behavior?
The "n/a" just signifies that there's no font cache file on your machine that matches:
<windows>\ServiceProfiles\LocalService\AppData\Local\FontCache-*-*.dat
Are there any large files in that directory?
As noted in the description, having information about the size of the font cache is useful for debugging startup-related problems. It's not required for any program functionality.
Comment 19•14 years ago
|
||
Inadittion to the comment #17.
I confirmed my Windows 7 has C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles\LocalService\AppData\Local\FontCache-*.dat file.
ドライブ C のボリューム ラベルがありません。
ボリューム シリアル番号は 3C63-6B61 です
C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles\LocalService\AppData\Local のディレクトリ
2011/02/15 05:55 <DIR> .
2011/02/15 05:55 <DIR> ..
2011/02/05 02:24 1,116,232 FontCache-S-1-5-21-4009116227-806356473-3186492530-1000-12288.dat
2010/11/30 10:00 6,066,892 FontCache-S-1-5-21-4009116227-806356473-3186492530-1000-4096.dat
2011/02/15 13:51 23,438,364 FontCache-S-1-5-21-4009116227-806356473-3186492530-1000-8192.dat
2011/02/15 05:54 37,273,080 FontCache-S-1-5-21-4009116227-806356473-3186492530-500-12288.dat
2011/02/15 13:51 558,296 FontCache-System.dat
2011/02/15 05:54 2,956,784 FontCache3.0.0.0.dat
2009/07/14 13:45 <DIR> Microsoft
2010/09/03 01:18 <DIR> PnrpSqm
2011/02/10 01:52 <DIR> Temp
6 個のファイル 71,409,648 バイト
5 個のディレクトリ 113,492,922,368 バイトの空き領域
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #19)
> 2011/02/05 02:24 1,116,232
> FontCache-S-1-5-21-4009116227-806356473-3186492530-1000-12288.dat
> 2010/11/30 10:00 6,066,892
> FontCache-S-1-5-21-4009116227-806356473-3186492530-1000-4096.dat
> 2011/02/15 13:51 23,438,364
> FontCache-S-1-5-21-4009116227-806356473-3186492530-1000-8192.dat
> 2011/02/15 05:54 37,273,080
> FontCache-S-1-5-21-4009116227-806356473-3186492530-500-12288.dat
Interesting, the code should pick up the size of the last one in that list but let me verify that.
Comment 21•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #20)
> Interesting, the code should pick up the size of the last one in that list but
> let me verify that.
It seems that the user except the administrator cannot get file size because access to the directory is limited.
(Comment #19 shows dir-outputs in "a command prompt as Administrator")
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #20)
>
> It seems that the user except the administrator cannot get file size because
> access to the directory is limited.
>
> (Comment #19 shows dir-outputs in "a command prompt as Administrator")
Ah, that makes complete sense.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•