Closed
Bug 63004
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
[rfe] ie parity - Browse as New Process
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: UI Design, enhancement, P3)
SeaMonkey
UI Design
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
Future
People
(Reporter: cesarb, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: arch, helpwanted)
To prevent crashage from one page spilling on other pages (or other unrelated
windows, like chatzilla), it would be useful to make each window its own process
(except modal dialogs). Of course it would have to be an option, since it would
use lots of memory.
(this was from the nutty-idea-of-the-week dept. Feel free to mark Future (aka
Never).)
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
pretty sure this has been suggeted in several other bug reports.
dupe. squish. threads not processes. squish.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 61942 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
No, not dupe.
Bug 61942 wants multiple threads to improve performance.
This bug wants multiple independent processes (not threads) to avoid a bug in
one window from closing everything due to a SIGSEGV. Threads still share a
common address space, which means a bug can easily spill into the rest of the
program.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Assuming that bug 61942 is fixed then the problem that the reporter really
wants addressed will be solved. Well, in most cases, on well designed
platforms. eg BeOS, where it's possible to crash threads in many windows while
still have many working windows.
Marking: arch, helpwanted, future.
Reasoning: Mozilla does not support running more than once see blocker
[wontfix] bug 40109.
Architecture prohibits us from even considering this. Until mozilla is capable
of running in a readonly environment we can't even consider implementing this
feature because we will clobber ourselves w/ changes to history or localstore
or mail or preferences. Result: VERY BAD THINGS (TM).
Sending this to XPApps. Asking Vishy (Don's replacement) and new ownerof the
blocker to QA this bug, if you agree that you have no intention of fixing this
bug please verify wontfix.
Anyone who wishes to fix this bug should feel free to reopen it and reassign it
to themselves. However, this bug should not be worked on until after all
blockers are fixed.
Other bugs that would need to be filed and resolved before this bug can be
opened are support for a mozilla --readonly --nolocking to prevent a new
instance of mozilla from ever locking files for reading and to prevent mozilla
from opening files for writing.
If we instead use a different implementation where we have a mozilla instance
that arbitrates all file/network access then if any problems ever happen there,
we're toast.
IE has a major advantage in that it can ask the os to do network and cache
accesses so that it doesn't matter how many instances it has (i verified that
IE can run multiple times by running four separate instances and asking task
manager to kill each one individually).
Assignee: asa → nobody
Component: Browser-General → XP Apps
Depends on: 40109
Keywords: arch,
helpwanted
OS: Linux → All
QA Contact: doronr → vishy
Hardware: PC → All
Summary: [RFE] Use multiple processes instead of one → [rfe] ie parity - Browse as New Process
Target Milestone: --- → Future
'nobody@mozilla.org' will not fix this. Please read previous comments and fix
all blockers and described blockers before reopening or reassigning.
QA: please verify this resolution.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
*** Bug 190400 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Updated•21 years ago
|
Product: Core → Mozilla Application Suite
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•