Closed
Bug 630703
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Provide a way to restart in 32-bit mode
Categories
(Toolkit :: Startup and Profile System, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla2.0b12
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
blocking2.0 | --- | betaN+ |
People
(Reporter: mossop, Assigned: mossop)
References
Details
(Keywords: dev-doc-needed, Whiteboard: [hardblocker])
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
6.86 KB,
patch
|
jaas
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Bug 628651 needs a way to restart the app into 32-bit mode. This bug will implement just that.
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
blocking2.0: --- → betaN+
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → dtownsend
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
This looks like it should work based on printf's I stuck in to verify it was following the right path, waiting on a universal build to actually test though.
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #508936 -
Flags: feedback?(benjamin)
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [hardblocker] → [hardblocker][b11]
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Removing from b11 radar, hoping to have it on trunk for Friday.
Whiteboard: [hardblocker][b11] → [hardblocker][ETA Feb-04]
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 508936 [details] [diff] [review]
WIP
Verified this manually now. The behaviour is that if restarting with eRestart32bit then it restarts in 32 bit, if restarting with eRestart64bit then it restarts in 64 bit and if neither it restarts in whatever architecture it is already running.
We don't really need the 64 bit bit at this point but it is easy enough for consistency.
I don't think we have a straightforward way to automatically test this do we?
Attachment #508936 -
Flags: feedback?(benjamin) → review?(benjamin)
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
I suspect that it is possible to test most of this on Mac OS X 10.6 using a similar methodology as I used with
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/mozapps/update/test/unit/test_0200_app_launch_apply_update.js
The parts that I can think of that are missing is verifying which arch is launched and only launching when testing with a Universal binary.
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [hardblocker][ETA Feb-04] → [hardblocker][has patch][needs review bsmedberg][needs tests][ETA Feb-04]
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 508936 [details] [diff] [review]
WIP
You're going to get a mac person to review this also, right?
Attachment #508936 -
Flags: review?(benjamin) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #508936 -
Flags: review?(joshmoz)
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [hardblocker][has patch][needs review bsmedberg][needs tests][ETA Feb-04] → [hardblocker][has patch][needs review josh][needs tests][ETA Feb-04]
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
The most straightforward way I could find this was to use mozmill. The tests here verify that on first run it is in 64-bit mode, a restart leaves it in 64-bit mode, a restart to 32-bit mode works, a restart leaves it in 32-bit mode and then a restart to 64-bit mode works.
The tests all skip if running on non-OSX or if earlier than 10.6 (confusingly the system-info version property holds "9" for OSX 10.5).
Attachment #509251 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [hardblocker][has patch][needs review josh][needs tests][ETA Feb-04] → [hardblocker][has patch][needs review josh][needs review whimboo][ETA Feb-04]
Comment on attachment 508936 [details] [diff] [review]
WIP
Can you do "eRestarti386" and "eRestartx86_64" instead of 32-bit and 64-bit? Ultimately you have to refer to a particular architecture and there just happens to be one choice right now...
Comment on attachment 508936 [details] [diff] [review]
WIP
Everything else looks fine to me but I'd like to see a patch with 32-bit and 64-bit references changed to specific architectures in nsIAppStartup.idl and MacLaunchHelper.mm.
Attachment #508936 -
Flags: review?(joshmoz) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 509251 [details] [diff] [review]
mozmill tests
Going to work on the test in bug 631052
Attachment #509251 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #509251 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Depends on: 631052
Whiteboard: [hardblocker][has patch][needs review josh][needs review whimboo][ETA Feb-04] → [hardblocker][has patch][needs review josh][ETA Feb-04]
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
Patch with the naming changes
Attachment #508936 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #509294 -
Flags: review?(joshmoz)
Attachment #509294 -
Flags: review?(joshmoz) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [hardblocker][has patch][needs review josh][ETA Feb-04] → [hardblocker][has patch][ETA Feb-04]
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
Landed, will look after the tests in bug 631052.
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f00b81064d57
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite?
Flags: in-litmus-
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [hardblocker][has patch][ETA Feb-04] → [hardblocker]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla2.0b12
Comment 12•14 years ago
|
||
I think this broke non-libxul builds. I'm getting this error.
Undefined symbols:
"_gRestartMode", referenced from:
LaunchChild(nsINativeAppSupport*, int) in nsAppRunner.o
ld: symbol(s) not found
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #12)
> I think this broke non-libxul builds. I'm getting this error.
>
> Undefined symbols:
> "_gRestartMode", referenced from:
> LaunchChild(nsINativeAppSupport*, int) in nsAppRunner.o
> ld: symbol(s) not found
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
See bug 631564
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
Those attributes have not been documented yet on MDN. Setting dev-doc-needed flag.
Keywords: dev-doc-needed
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•