Closed
Bug 636251
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Use JSOPTION_NO_SCRIPT_RVAL in nsFrameMessageManager.cpp
Categories
(Core :: IPC, defect)
Core
IPC
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mwu, Assigned: mwu)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
1.96 KB,
patch
|
jorendorff
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The return value is never used so we can use JSOPTION_NO_SCRIPT_RVAL and pass null.
Attachment #514589 -
Flags: review?(Olli.Pettay)
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 514589 [details] [diff] [review]
Use JSOPTION_NO_SCRIPT_RVAL in nsFrameMessageManager.cpp
I can't review this, since I haven't managed to find any good
documentation when JSOPTION_NO_SCRIPT_RVAL should be set and when unset.
Why couldn't it be set when mCx is created and never unset?
Attachment #514589 -
Flags: review?(Olli.Pettay)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Comment on attachment 514589 [details] [diff] [review]
> Use JSOPTION_NO_SCRIPT_RVAL in nsFrameMessageManager.cpp
>
> I can't review this, since I haven't managed to find any good
> documentation when JSOPTION_NO_SCRIPT_RVAL should be set and when unset.
>
> Why couldn't it be set when mCx is created and never unset?
Most other code I've seen that set these sort of flags always unset them after compiling. I assume this is so other code trying to use this context don't unexpectedly get hit by flags they didn't set themselves.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #514589 -
Flags: review?(jorendorff)
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 514589 [details] [diff] [review]
Use JSOPTION_NO_SCRIPT_RVAL in nsFrameMessageManager.cpp
I don't know what an nsFrameScriptExecutor is, but as far as JSAPI use is concerned, this patch is definitely good.
Attachment #514589 -
Flags: review?(jorendorff) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•