Closed
Bug 64029
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
[RFE] scrollbar suppression and styling
Categories
(Core :: XUL, enhancement)
Core
XUL
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
Future
People
(Reporter: rvj, Assigned: eric)
Details
There now does not seem to be a way of
1. suppressing the in-built scrollbars of the widgets.
2. styling the in-built scrolbar
Prior to M18 it was possible to use the selector mechanism to hide the in built
scrollbar(s)
treechildren > scrollbars
{visibility:collapse}
a)This is now no longer supported
b) nor does the attribute overflow:hidden appear to work
I have had some conversations via the XPFE newsgroup but it is unclear how this
is to be resolved. Am I correct in thinking that overflow:hidden should work?
a) tree widget e.g. <tree style="overflow:hidden" src="file"/>
b) iframe element e.g. <iframe style="overflow:hidden" src="file"/>
It would be useful to be able to selectively suppress one or both of the
scrollbars but in this case a new attribute would be required with options such
as none, horizontal, vertical, both, auto.
a) tree widget e.g. <tree id="tree" scrolling="horizontal" src="file"/>
b) iframe element e.g. <iframe class="iframe" scrolling="both" src="file"/>
This still leaves the question of how to style the inbuilt scrollbars
Is some kind of id or class based style for scrollbars planned.?
Please note that having suppressed one or both scrollbar(s), there still is the
need to provide support the scrolling of widgets programmatically.
With the tree widget, methods such as scrolltoindex are available.
I presume that scrolling the contents of an iframe programmatically is
possible by creating a click event on the appropriate hidden scrollbar
(horizontal/vertical)?
Is this true?
You shouldn't be able to style scrollbars from the document's style sheet with
selectors matching elements that aren't in the document. That that once worked
was a bug.
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
When we switch to XBL form controls, you'll be able to swap the binding and do
whatever you like to the form controls. If that makes no sense then ask about it
in netscape.public.mozilla.xbl. ;-)
In the meantime, I know of no standard compliant way of doing what you want, so
should this be marked INVALID?
Whiteboard: INVALID?
Of particular concern is the iframe widget
IE has always had the SCROLLING="NO" attribute for the HTML iframe element and
I was suprised to find no equivalent in XUL.
1. While I can wait for an XBL solution just to hide the in-built scrollbars of
both the tree and iframe widget, can someone tell me if I will be able to
select and issue click events against a particular hidden scrollbar so that I
can scroll the contents of an iframe up/down and left/right programatically.
(an example?)
2. If not, can this please can this remain as an RFE?
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
->evaughan/future/rfe
Assignee: trudelle → evaughan
Severity: normal → enhancement
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
Marking NEW to get it off our unconfirmed radar.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: other → All
Hardware: Other → All
Summary: scrollbar suppression and styling → [RFE] scrollbar suppression and styling
Whiteboard: INVALID?
PS The Mozilla DOM newsgroups have raised this problem on several occations.
Can anyone clarify if the attribute overflow:none will be implimented for
iframe and tree widgets in particular ?
This would be a much simpler solution than XBL !!!!!!
'overflow' is a property, not an attribute, and it does not take a 'none'
value. You probably mean 'hidden'.
apologies - although the same basic questions remain
a) Should/will this method of hiding scrollbars work with all widgets and what
milestone will it available?
b) Will it be possible to programatically control the scrolling of such widgets
by using the createEvent method to enter keyboard up/down/left/right/page
up/page down keys (or is there an even simpler method)
Thanks
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
A related issue is a need to distinguish between XUL widgets and HTML widgets.
As an alternative approach, I tried to suppress all XUL scrollbars by
defining ' scrollbar visibility:collapse} ' in XUL.CSS
Unfortunately cascading applies this to the scrollbars within any subordinate
html documents.
Surely some scoping should be possible or a separate mechanism for applying
styling to just XUL widgets.
One idea that was suggested by D. Hyatt was a XUL class attribute(s) for each
widget so that it would be possible to define XUL CSS selectors. For example
.iframescrollbar {visibility:collapse}
.treescrollbar {visibility:visible;width:30px;background-color:red}
A typical requirement is the need to supress the scrollbars on a web cam image
(iframe+image). The XUL application will provide the panning controls
up/down/left/right to control what appears in the iframe.
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
Ok I think this pre-XBL request is no longer valid. Most of my concerns are
handled by xbl. Marking invalid.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 107495 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Component: XP Toolkit/Widgets: XUL → XUL
QA Contact: jrgmorrison → xptoolkit.widgets
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•