644429 - Add GECKO_2_0_BASE tag to m-c/m-2.1/m-2.0 and GECKO_2_1_BASE tag to m-c/m-2.1

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Release Engineering :: General, defect)

Description

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

It looks like m-2.0 (and m-2.1, though I've barely discovered its existence) were branched without tagging their m-c base.
Unlike existing GECKO_1_9_1_BASE and GECKO_1_9_2_BASE tags.

GECKO_2_0_BASE should be added to all affected repositories, after the fact now :-|
The relevant changeset is e56ecd8b3a68.

Fwiw, its previous changeset is 290712e55ade which was tagged THUNDERBIRD_3_3a3_RELEASE (in m-c).

Ftr, see
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.planning/browse_thread/thread/c04d9913c35834f2/644ccb63c0635f57

NB: And branching steps should be checked to include this tagging _before_ branching...

*****

I guess a GECKO_2_1_BASE tag should also be added to m-c/m-2.1, if someone can detail m-2.1 status. Otherwise, I'll file a separate bug.

Comment 1

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

(In reply to comment #0)
> Fwiw, its previous changeset is 290712e55ade which was tagged
> THUNDERBIRD_3_3a3_RELEASE (in m-c).

Mark, while there, THUNDERBIRD_3_3a3_BUILD1 and THUNDERBIRD_3_3a3_RELEASE are in m-c/m-2.1, but "missing" in m-2.0.
(probably because m-2.0 branched in the meantime...)

Comment 2

[David Baron :dbaron: (⌚️UTC-5, no longer working on Mozilla)]

GECKO_2_1_BASE should be https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e273946b74c8

Comment 3

[Mark Banner (:standard8)]

(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Fwiw, its previous changeset is 290712e55ade which was tagged
> > THUNDERBIRD_3_3a3_RELEASE (in m-c).
> 
> Mark, while there, THUNDERBIRD_3_3a3_BUILD1 and THUNDERBIRD_3_3a3_RELEASE are
> in m-c/m-2.1, but "missing" in m-2.0.
> (probably because m-2.0 branched in the meantime...)

I don't really care. It was released from m-c not from m-2.0, and as far as I'm concerned, that's the important bit.

Comment 4

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

I pushed all of these a few minutes ago.

Comment 5

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

(In reply to comment #3)
> I don't really care. It was released from m-c not from m-2.0, and as far as I'm
> concerned, that's the important bit.

Sure. Yet, do you agree that I manually tag it in m-2.0 ftr?

(In reply to comment #4)
> I pushed all of these a few minutes ago.

Almost: GECKO_2_0_BASE is still missing in m-2.1.