Closed
Bug 649123
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Run ANALYZE on dirty places.sqlite files
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: sdwilsh, Assigned: dustin)
References
Details
Somewhat similar to bug 600980, I'd like to have us run the following commands on our dirty places.sqlite files:
ANALYZE moz_places
ANALYZE moz_bookmarks
ANALYZE moz_historyvisits
ANALYZE moz_inputhistory
This is likely to change performance numbers, but will bring out testing environment more inline with what we ship to users after bug 599641.
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Is this a one-off or something that you want done periodically?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is this a one-off or something that you want done periodically?
It's a one-off (unless we change the contents, and then it's probably a good idea to update it every so often).
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
I should also elaborate...
After this command is ran, sqlite_stat1 should be populated with data. If sqlite_stat2 is populated, that means the client that was used is compiled differently than what we are shipping with.
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
I think we should update the script that generates the db to run this as last step. See also bug 635474 for a needed update.
I don't think as it is now this is going to be super-useful, since the database contents are pretty much far from what a user would have (140 000 bookmarks in a single folder).
Alice, could you please point me again at the generate-db script on mxr?
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> I don't think as it is now this is going to be super-useful, since the database
> contents are pretty much far from what a user would have (140 000 bookmarks in
> a single folder).
Remember that there are three different dirty databases ;)
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
Yes, and all of three are quite far from a common user database.
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
Scheduled to make the change on Friday April 29th at 3pm PST.
Comment 9•14 years ago
|
||
Turns out that I no longer have access to the vm that hosts the dirty profiles, the work will have to be done by someone with releng access.
Component: Talos → Release Engineering
Product: Testing → mozilla.org
QA Contact: talos → release
Version: Trunk → other
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
Alice,
Same with this, can you give me more detail on where/how to do this?
Assignee: nobody → bear
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
Requested info provided in email.
Comment 12•13 years ago
|
||
Any ETA here?
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•13 years ago
|
||
This change is scheduled to land this Sunday, along with bug 600980 - that will mean new performance numbers on Monday morning.
Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Flags: needs-treeclosure?
Updated•13 years ago
|
Flags: needs-treeclosure? → needs-treeclosure+
Whiteboard: [downtime 6/16 4am-8am PDT]
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•13 years ago
|
||
done, and sync'd to build.mozilla.org. I'll trigger more tests on 5a46d17c72ca once build.mozilla.org's back up.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•13 years ago
|
||
six runs of talos-dirty re-triggered on a09dfe6c7c19, actually, as it was the last revision to have completely run its tests before the profiles were updated.
Updated•13 years ago
|
Flags: needs-treeclosure+
Updated•13 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [downtime 6/16 4am-8am PDT]
Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•