Bug 653186 (addonsdk10b5)

release Add-on SDK 1.0b5

RESOLVED FIXED in 1.0b5

Status

Add-on SDK
General
P1
normal
RESOLVED FIXED
7 years ago
7 years ago

People

(Reporter: myk, Assigned: dcm)

Tracking

unspecified
1.0b5
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(URL)

(Reporter)

Description

7 years ago
We should release Add-on SDK 1.0b5!

Use this bug to track tasks that need to be done to release the product, like spinning candidate builds and publishing a blog post about it, as well as code blockers for the release.

To nominate a bug to block the release, comment in this bug or ask the drivers (Dave Mason or Myk Melez) about it in the discussion group, on IRC, or by email.
(Reporter)

Updated

7 years ago
Alias: addonsdk10b5
bug 653210 filed about the current test failures. Potential patch (needs thought) is attached to bug 621078. I think it's a blocker.
Would bug 597837 be worth getting into b5? It's pretty low-risk, and would help people with figuring out what's wrong with their package names.
(Reporter)

Comment 3

7 years ago
(In reply to comment #1)
> bug 653210 filed about the current test failures. Potential patch (needs
> thought) is attached to bug 621078. I think it's a blocker.

Yup, good point.  Marked as blocking (and fortunately already fixed).


(In reply to comment #2)
> Would bug 597837 be worth getting into b5? It's pretty low-risk, and would help
> people with figuring out what's wrong with their package names.

Definitely worth it.  Approved and landed.
Depends on: 653210
I'm of the opinion that there should be a respin of the RC after bug 653891 gets fixed one way or the other.

Without either of those patches, there'll be lots of user-facing console spam with the "elapsed time" counters, with no real user-facing benefits from it since they're only in there to help debug the test failures.

I already brought this up with Myk on IRC earlier tonight, so this is just to keep it on the radar. :)
Depends on: 653891
+1 on comment #4. I think it's really distracting, and not generally useful enough to have it on by default.

Another blocker nomination: bug 653906. I was working on an add-on. Updated sdk source, and boom. Now I get nothing but that every time I do cfx run.
(Reporter)

Updated

7 years ago
No longer depends on: 653891
(Reporter)

Updated

7 years ago
Depends on: 654162

Updated

7 years ago
No longer depends on: 654162

Updated

7 years ago
Depends on: 654162
(Reporter)

Updated

7 years ago
Depends on: 654095
(Reporter)

Comment 6

7 years ago
(In reply to comment #5)
> Another blocker nomination: bug 653906. I was working on an add-on. Updated sdk
> source, and boom. Now I get nothing but that every time I do cfx run.

Hmm, indeed.
Depends on: 653906
(Reporter)

Updated

7 years ago
Depends on: 655135
Heh, given that we released 1.0b5 on 5/5/11, I think we can close this ticket now..
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.